Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20170331202136.100342-1-briannorris@chromium.org>
 <20190803010641.GA22848@google.com> <875znfhv2b.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <875znfhv2b.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Date:   Fri, 2 Aug 2019 19:02:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+ASDXPCxDQAFPcPu5N6aY9mRDRF2FmsSTWAdgvSNDa2uPsRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: fix system hang problem after resume"
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
        Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 6:55 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> writes:
>
> > + Doug, Matthias, who are seeing problems (or, failure to try to
> > recover, as predicted below)
> > + Amit's new email
> > + new maintainers
> >
> > Perhaps it's my fault for marking this RFC. But I changed the status
> > back to "New" in Patchwork, in case that helps:
>
> But I still see it marked as RFC. So the patch in question is:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9657277/

Oops, I didn't hit the "Update" button :(

I changed it now, but I'll change it back again.

> Changing the patchwork state to RFC means that it's dropped and out of
> my radar. Also, if I see "RFC" in the subject I assume that's a patch
> which I should not apply by default.

Ack. Well, there were some "RFCs" I sent recently that you *did*
apply, so I didn't really know what happens normally.

> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
...
> > FWIW, I got an Acked-by from Amit when he was still at Marvell. And
> > another Reviewed-by from Dmitry. This still applies. Should I resend?
> > (I'll do that if I don't hear a response within a few days.)
>
> This patch is from 2017 so better to resend, and without RFC markings.

Yep, will do.

Brian