Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 0ED096037C
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc:     Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
        Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: fix system hang problem after resume"
References: <20170331202136.100342-1-briannorris@chromium.org>
        <20190803010641.GA22848@google.com>
        <875znfhv2b.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
        <CA+ASDXPCxDQAFPcPu5N6aY9mRDRF2FmsSTWAdgvSNDa2uPsRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 03 Aug 2019 05:08:47 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CA+ASDXPCxDQAFPcPu5N6aY9mRDRF2FmsSTWAdgvSNDa2uPsRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
        (Brian Norris's message of "Fri, 2 Aug 2019 19:02:52 -0700")
Message-ID: <871ry3hufk.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> writes:

>> Changing the patchwork state to RFC means that it's dropped and out of
>> my radar. Also, if I see "RFC" in the subject I assume that's a patch
>> which I should not apply by default.
>
> Ack. Well, there were some "RFCs" I sent recently that you *did*
> apply, so I didn't really know what happens normally.

True, I have sometimes applied RFC patches in case they look good enough
and I do not want them to get lost (and this is a good example of RFC
patches getting lost). But by default I drop RFC patches after a quick
glance.

>> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> ...
>> > FWIW, I got an Acked-by from Amit when he was still at Marvell. And
>> > another Reviewed-by from Dmitry. This still applies. Should I resend?
>> > (I'll do that if I don't hear a response within a few days.)
>>
>> This patch is from 2017 so better to resend, and without RFC markings.
>
> Yep, will do.

Thanks.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches