Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 3 Aug 2019 13:41:27 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
        fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu/nocb: Provide separate no-CBs
 grace-period kthreads
Message-ID: <20190803174127.GA83025@google.com>
References: <20190801225009.GA17155@linux.ibm.com>
 <20190801225028.18225-3-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190801225028.18225-3-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 03:50:20PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Currently, there is one no-CBs rcuo kthread per CPU, and these kthreads
> are divided into groups.  The first rcuo kthread to come online in a
> given group is that group's leader, and the leader both waits for grace
> periods and invokes its CPU's callbacks.  The non-leader rcuo kthreads
> only invoke callbacks.
> 
> This works well in the real-time/embedded environments for which it was
> intended because such environments tend not to generate all that many
> callbacks.  However, given huge floods of callbacks, it is possible for
> the leader kthread to be stuck invoking callbacks while its followers
> wait helplessly while their callbacks pile up.  This is a good recipe
> for an OOM, and rcutorture's new callback-flood capability does generate
> such OOMs.
> 
> One strategy would be to wait until such OOMs start happening in
> production, but similar OOMs have in fact happened starting in 2018.
> It would therefore be wise to take a more proactive approach.

I haven't looked much into nocbs/nohz_full stuff (yet). In particular, I did
not even know that the rcuo threads do grace period life-cycle management and
waiting, I thought only the RCU GP threads did :-/. however, it seems this is
a completely separate grace-period management state machine outside of the
RCU GP thread right?

I was wondering for this patch, could we also just have the rcuo
leader handle both callback execution and waking other non-leader threads at
the same time? So like, execute few callbacks, then do the wake up of the
non-leaders to execute their callbacks, the get back to executing their own
callbacks, etc. That way we don't need a separate rcuog thread to wait for
grace period, would that not work?

If you don't mind could you share with me a kvm.sh command (which has config,
boot parameters etc) that can produce the OOM without this patch? I'd
like to take a closer look at it.

Is there also a short answer for my the RCU GP thread cannot do the job of
these new rcuog threads?

thanks a lot,

 - Joel


> This commit therefore features per-CPU rcuo kthreads that do nothing
> but invoke callbacks.  Instead of having one of these kthreads act as
> leader, each group has a separate rcog kthread that handles grace periods
> for its group.  Because these rcuog kthreads do not invoke callbacks,
> callback floods on one CPU no longer block callbacks from reaching the
> rcuc callback-invocation kthreads on other CPUs.
> 
> This change does introduce additional kthreads, however:
> 
> 1.	The number of additional kthreads is about the square root of
> 	the number of CPUs, so that a 4096-CPU system would have only
> 	about 64 additional kthreads.  Note that recent changes
> 	decreased the number of rcuo kthreads by a factor of two
> 	(CONFIG_PREEMPT=n) or even three (CONFIG_PREEMPT=y), so
> 	this still represents a significant improvement on most systems.
> 
> 2.	The leading "rcuo" of the rcuog kthreads should allow existing
> 	scripting to affinity these additional kthreads as needed, the
> 	same as for the rcuop and rcuos kthreads.  (There are no longer
> 	any rcuob kthreads.)
> 
> 3.	A state-machine approach was considered and rejected.  Although
> 	this would allow the rcuo kthreads to continue their dual
> 	leader/follower roles, it complicates callback invocation
> 	and makes it more difficult to consolidate rcuo callback
> 	invocation with existing softirq callback invocation.
> 
> The introduction of rcuog kthreads should thus be acceptable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.h        |   6 +-
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 115 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index 32b3348d3a4d..dc3c53cb9608 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -200,8 +200,8 @@ struct rcu_data {
>  	atomic_long_t nocb_q_count_lazy; /*  invocation (all stages). */
>  	struct rcu_head *nocb_cb_head;	/* CBs ready to invoke. */
>  	struct rcu_head **nocb_cb_tail;
> -	struct swait_queue_head nocb_wq; /* For nocb kthreads to sleep on. */
> -	struct task_struct *nocb_cb_kthread;
> +	struct swait_queue_head nocb_cb_wq; /* For nocb kthreads to sleep on. */
> +	struct task_struct *nocb_gp_kthread;
>  	raw_spinlock_t nocb_lock;	/* Guard following pair of fields. */
>  	int nocb_defer_wakeup;		/* Defer wakeup of nocb_kthread. */
>  	struct timer_list nocb_timer;	/* Enforce finite deferral. */
> @@ -211,6 +211,8 @@ struct rcu_data {
>  					/* CBs waiting for GP. */
>  	struct rcu_head **nocb_gp_tail;
>  	bool nocb_gp_sleep;		/* Is the nocb GP thread asleep? */
> +	struct swait_queue_head nocb_gp_wq; /* For nocb kthreads to sleep on. */
> +	struct task_struct *nocb_cb_kthread;
>  	struct rcu_data *nocb_next_cb_rdp;
>  					/* Next rcu_data in wakeup chain. */
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 5a72700c3a32..c3b6493313ab 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ static void __wake_nocb_leader(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool force,
>  	struct rcu_data *rdp_leader = rdp->nocb_gp_rdp;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&rdp->nocb_lock);
> -	if (!READ_ONCE(rdp_leader->nocb_cb_kthread)) {
> +	if (!READ_ONCE(rdp_leader->nocb_gp_kthread)) {
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -1541,7 +1541,7 @@ static void __wake_nocb_leader(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool force,
>  		del_timer(&rdp->nocb_timer);
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
>  		smp_mb(); /* ->nocb_gp_sleep before swake_up_one(). */
> -		swake_up_one(&rdp_leader->nocb_wq);
> +		swake_up_one(&rdp_leader->nocb_gp_wq);
>  	} else {
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
>  	}
> @@ -1646,7 +1646,7 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue(struct rcu_data *rdp,
>  	smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* Store *old_rhpp before _wake test. */
>  
>  	/* If we are not being polled and there is a kthread, awaken it ... */
> -	t = READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread);
> +	t = READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread);
>  	if (rcu_nocb_poll || !t) {
>  		trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu,
>  				    TPS("WakeNotPoll"));
> @@ -1786,7 +1786,7 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>   * No-CBs GP kthreads come here to wait for additional callbacks to show up.
>   * This function does not return until callbacks appear.
>   */
> -static void nocb_leader_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
> +static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
>  {
>  	bool firsttime = true;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> @@ -1794,12 +1794,10 @@ static void nocb_leader_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
>  	struct rcu_data *rdp;
>  	struct rcu_head **tail;
>  
> -wait_again:
> -
>  	/* Wait for callbacks to appear. */
>  	if (!rcu_nocb_poll) {
>  		trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, my_rdp->cpu, TPS("Sleep"));
> -		swait_event_interruptible_exclusive(my_rdp->nocb_wq,
> +		swait_event_interruptible_exclusive(my_rdp->nocb_gp_wq,
>  				!READ_ONCE(my_rdp->nocb_gp_sleep));
>  		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&my_rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
>  		my_rdp->nocb_gp_sleep = true;
> @@ -1838,7 +1836,7 @@ static void nocb_leader_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
>  			trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, my_rdp->cpu,
>  					    TPS("WokeEmpty"));
>  		}
> -		goto wait_again;
> +		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Wait for one grace period. */
> @@ -1862,34 +1860,47 @@ static void nocb_leader_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
>  		rdp->nocb_cb_tail = rdp->nocb_gp_tail;
>  		*tail = rdp->nocb_gp_head;
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
> -		if (rdp != my_rdp && tail == &rdp->nocb_cb_head) {
> +		if (tail == &rdp->nocb_cb_head) {
>  			/* List was empty, so wake up the kthread.  */
> -			swake_up_one(&rdp->nocb_wq);
> +			swake_up_one(&rdp->nocb_cb_wq);
>  		}
>  	}
> +}
>  
> -	/* If we (the GP kthreads) don't have CBs, go wait some more. */
> -	if (!my_rdp->nocb_cb_head)
> -		goto wait_again;
> +/*
> + * No-CBs grace-period-wait kthread.  There is one of these per group
> + * of CPUs, but only once at least one CPU in that group has come online
> + * at least once since boot.  This kthread checks for newly posted
> + * callbacks from any of the CPUs it is responsible for, waits for a
> + * grace period, then awakens all of the rcu_nocb_cb_kthread() instances
> + * that then have callback-invocation work to do.
> + */
> +static int rcu_nocb_gp_kthread(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct rcu_data *rdp = arg;
> +
> +	for (;;)
> +		nocb_gp_wait(rdp);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
>   * No-CBs CB kthreads come here to wait for additional callbacks to show up.
> - * This function does not return until callbacks appear.
> + * This function returns true ("keep waiting") until callbacks appear and
> + * then false ("stop waiting") when callbacks finally do appear.
>   */
> -static void nocb_follower_wait(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> +static bool nocb_follower_wait(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  {
> -	for (;;) {
> -		trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu, TPS("FollowerSleep"));
> -		swait_event_interruptible_exclusive(rdp->nocb_wq,
> -					 READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_cb_head));
> -		if (smp_load_acquire(&rdp->nocb_cb_head)) {
> -			/* ^^^ Ensure CB invocation follows _head test. */
> -			return;
> -		}
> -		WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
> -		trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu, TPS("WokeEmpty"));
> +	trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu, TPS("FollowerSleep"));
> +	swait_event_interruptible_exclusive(rdp->nocb_cb_wq,
> +				 READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_cb_head));
> +	if (smp_load_acquire(&rdp->nocb_cb_head)) { /* VVV */
> +		/* ^^^ Ensure CB invocation follows _head test. */
> +		return false;
>  	}
> +	WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
> +	trace_rcu_nocb_wake(rcu_state.name, rdp->cpu, TPS("WokeEmpty"));
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1899,7 +1910,7 @@ static void nocb_follower_wait(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>   * have to do quite so many wakeups (as in they only need to wake the
>   * no-CBs GP kthreads, not the CB kthreads).
>   */
> -static int rcu_nocb_kthread(void *arg)
> +static int rcu_nocb_cb_kthread(void *arg)
>  {
>  	int c, cl;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> @@ -1911,10 +1922,8 @@ static int rcu_nocb_kthread(void *arg)
>  	/* Each pass through this loop invokes one batch of callbacks */
>  	for (;;) {
>  		/* Wait for callbacks. */
> -		if (rdp->nocb_gp_rdp == rdp)
> -			nocb_leader_wait(rdp);
> -		else
> -			nocb_follower_wait(rdp);
> +		while (nocb_follower_wait(rdp))
> +			continue;
>  
>  		/* Pull the ready-to-invoke callbacks onto local list. */
>  		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
> @@ -2048,7 +2057,8 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
>  static void __init rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  {
>  	rdp->nocb_tail = &rdp->nocb_head;
> -	init_swait_queue_head(&rdp->nocb_wq);
> +	init_swait_queue_head(&rdp->nocb_cb_wq);
> +	init_swait_queue_head(&rdp->nocb_gp_wq);
>  	rdp->nocb_cb_tail = &rdp->nocb_cb_head;
>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&rdp->nocb_lock);
>  	timer_setup(&rdp->nocb_timer, do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_timer, 0);
> @@ -2056,50 +2066,39 @@ static void __init rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  
>  /*
>   * If the specified CPU is a no-CBs CPU that does not already have its
> - * rcuo kthread, spawn it.  If the CPUs are brought online out of order,
> - * this can require re-organizing the GP-CB relationships.
> + * rcuo CB kthread, spawn it.  Additionally, if the rcuo GP kthread
> + * for this CPU's group has not yet been created, spawn it as well.
>   */
>  static void rcu_spawn_one_nocb_kthread(int cpu)
>  {
> -	struct rcu_data *rdp;
> -	struct rcu_data *rdp_last;
> -	struct rcu_data *rdp_old_leader;
> -	struct rcu_data *rdp_spawn = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
> +	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
> +	struct rcu_data *rdp_gp;
>  	struct task_struct *t;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If this isn't a no-CBs CPU or if it already has an rcuo kthread,
>  	 * then nothing to do.
>  	 */
> -	if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(cpu) || rdp_spawn->nocb_cb_kthread)
> +	if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(cpu) || rdp->nocb_cb_kthread)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* If we didn't spawn the GP kthread first, reorganize! */
> -	rdp_old_leader = rdp_spawn->nocb_gp_rdp;
> -	if (rdp_old_leader != rdp_spawn && !rdp_old_leader->nocb_cb_kthread) {
> -		rdp_last = NULL;
> -		rdp = rdp_old_leader;
> -		do {
> -			rdp->nocb_gp_rdp = rdp_spawn;
> -			if (rdp_last && rdp != rdp_spawn)
> -				rdp_last->nocb_next_cb_rdp = rdp;
> -			if (rdp == rdp_spawn) {
> -				rdp = rdp->nocb_next_cb_rdp;
> -			} else {
> -				rdp_last = rdp;
> -				rdp = rdp->nocb_next_cb_rdp;
> -				rdp_last->nocb_next_cb_rdp = NULL;
> -			}
> -		} while (rdp);
> -		rdp_spawn->nocb_next_cb_rdp = rdp_old_leader;
> +	rdp_gp = rdp->nocb_gp_rdp;
> +	if (!rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread) {
> +		t = kthread_run(rcu_nocb_gp_kthread, rdp_gp,
> +				"rcuog/%d", rdp_gp->cpu);
> +		if (WARN_ONCE(IS_ERR(t), "%s: Could not start rcuo GP kthread, OOM is now expected behavior\n", __func__))
> +			return;
> +		WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread, t);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Spawn the kthread for this CPU. */
> -	t = kthread_run(rcu_nocb_kthread, rdp_spawn,
> +	t = kthread_run(rcu_nocb_cb_kthread, rdp,
>  			"rcuo%c/%d", rcu_state.abbr, cpu);
> -	if (WARN_ONCE(IS_ERR(t), "%s: Could not start rcuo kthread, OOM is now expected behavior\n", __func__))
> +	if (WARN_ONCE(IS_ERR(t), "%s: Could not start rcuo CB kthread, OOM is now expected behavior\n", __func__))
>  		return;
> -	WRITE_ONCE(rdp_spawn->nocb_cb_kthread, t);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread, t);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread, rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>