Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp1980347ybh; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 14:42:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx21bp6FqXA5knrEidJkljgu6kiyok34wgz+PbCjYCX8yF4OJb5w0OpciaWrUjesVfWCUmO X-Received: by 2002:a65:4205:: with SMTP id c5mr22343662pgq.267.1564954951119; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:42:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1564954951; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=N2vp/vafB/OFs7SNqbBOSlcGQqj7bomXD/XH4llwoJA9G+FNOmVvvV0sdvwrCmA3k/ xVcz0rcyyP1OVspp7xNs0R2wOll4cGQyPyRX9ghFHRpTGSk7j+68+jBrg9b678+EIHtl pwzFKWfSkQjtaaNZBVwRKVtg3zk8TxRgKlAC+0lTYP5zfgK9IKmUya5PIy+v+uv9uUqj jxScl42MS08EUWHD40w7RbAreT/wwTZ5hyJLWUSoqtE9mDfQdl6rcUPLsSUpODbUAIGl 4SDK9D+0zJKfQmTSAqsENXVHYWIDypMV3XPa6iYK6AbLfaMPXBpJTtbyNf2NQGU0GkHV kZSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=AIONVD1ibu9lCnP7gBI5NeGvxxgvVJwLeJRH750Gszo=; b=rZBZ4kh7DfY2t2tDt7m6wfG9qbvlbtC7TQ7Jfyw3gPNbzUmLPzFcWXBbNYx2LAFcZx X7iueaBlOl+WQBRm9m8gBXZS8OyLF8yvQ1e69lrJdvgYxigy6hFQoMtjIDW4BcrU2l00 OuLcfNGV7ipBMJU0VIEdTS2cmMn+IMARWA+hSoAYmT4T1IgBhNvA1m4QQTHIJGjgm7/T RV2m6m3vt+uWGDfrOMGkqOPWZDH61F6pWMz02S3Y1FhNHU5HPUsLHcIKzc63qG7zUsD1 TueLKukzns79spmXsT4A05asFx8NXUzxz/K+GSMZhncHDW3f9wAqygf9gYrN11YPPFNg 9QEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="l6/GXqxR"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h35si9424575pgm.183.2019.08.04.14.42.15; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="l6/GXqxR"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726834AbfHDVks (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 4 Aug 2019 17:40:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:46386 "EHLO mail-pf1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726536AbfHDVks (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Aug 2019 17:40:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id c3so15410590pfa.13; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:40:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AIONVD1ibu9lCnP7gBI5NeGvxxgvVJwLeJRH750Gszo=; b=l6/GXqxR/s34zlyqJbk/kDxjD3yWDqEQe/AOqLflWOvrm5eDHR/+h64o5FGJVVZDm7 AwjgeyGZZdKef0rYvnbiV+VVbqlH03c+/Srjd2r9Zj+6k3KwG7Fcina+ZOVD6jjcndEs m+NnyuUfp3kqqdx+MqMM0U9dp85aAko8k8ZJd6uqb/CMJsH8T4m2SrLXKjcEOHCMLJdn NznoDSCuK5a0TUfWCagRu70OdxNzQH7i4t1HGVY6UMearz1sHdD2pMxacliOxKD+PQmJ 8zD7/pt5jYtEkhlcpCTn1BHo1kZKHX/RyFxS3pNMHaOBsmremV8j1DGM3LazIUu1lY7z 9ncQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AIONVD1ibu9lCnP7gBI5NeGvxxgvVJwLeJRH750Gszo=; b=gn23kkUqe9hlp8H/+qXx1hm/O5fNqHqkllFELxn+7ZJnnpP1DKUSsPNTZnJ+DAtvxP cj+gJceSKVIziAeZZ8agFf6kvIIWc0rCYgk6leQ+Ys0YO4OX23hYD2ig686wouLrnoRd QcImRmWcvLE6b6W/gPy5mEsfwT/BjPLXFUJGQ6kd7fU1zFXFTG6snN7vNTO+sJPo2yUA E40fyFG5v9Mt1oNEy8iZT/ndPPR2gbshGxgz1jcneeN+lJj8lZFb1/ExCH5mdKxqh/iA rhjl4MC/Xa9BpOYv5DresF+uMDRlnHcMwCw6ykW8QEG7wNVuzJaxAD69AUPc0vXiR1yz 99YA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUhHbRJGSh5z7UMMeWrdk+OsFP/JOIyX0kqlVcN/xI/CjM6S6+Z IC/xBPxY843Dc3/rN4IxlW8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:36a7:: with SMTP id t36mr14741393pjb.34.1564954847063; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blueforge.nvidia.com (searspoint.nvidia.com. [216.228.112.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 143sm123751024pgc.6.2019.08.04.14.40.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 04 Aug 2019 14:40:46 -0700 (PDT) From: john.hubbard@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: jhubbard@nvidia.com To: Andrew Morton Cc: Alexander Viro , =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20T=C3=B6pel?= , Boaz Harrosh , Christoph Hellwig , Daniel Vetter , Dan Williams , Dave Chinner , David Airlie , "David S . Miller" , Ilya Dryomov , Jan Kara , Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me=20Glisse?= , Johannes Thumshirn , Magnus Karlsson , Matthew Wilcox , Miklos Szeredi , Ming Lei , Sage Weil , Santosh Shilimkar , Yan Zheng , netdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, LKML , John Hubbard , Ira Weiny Subject: [PATCH v6 1/3] mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock() Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 14:40:40 -0700 Message-Id: <20190804214042.4564-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20190804214042.4564-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> References: <20190804214042.4564-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NVConfidentiality: public Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: John Hubbard Provide a more capable variation of put_user_pages_dirty_lock(), and delete put_user_pages_dirty(). This is based on the following: 1. Lots of call sites become simpler if a bool is passed into put_user_page*(), instead of making the call site choose which put_user_page*() variant to call. 2. Christoph Hellwig's observation that set_page_dirty_lock() is usually correct, and set_page_dirty() is usually a bug, or at least questionable, within a put_user_page*() calling chain. This leads to the following API choices: * put_user_pages_dirty_lock(page, npages, make_dirty) * There is no put_user_pages_dirty(). You have to hand code that, in the rare case that it's required. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Ira Weiny Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 5 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c | 5 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c | 13 +-- drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c | 5 +- drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c | 19 +--- include/linux/mm.h | 5 +- mm/gup.c | 115 +++++++++------------ 7 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c index 08da840ed7ee..965cf9dea71a 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c @@ -54,10 +54,7 @@ static void __ib_umem_release(struct ib_device *dev, struct ib_umem *umem, int d for_each_sg_page(umem->sg_head.sgl, &sg_iter, umem->sg_nents, 0) { page = sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter); - if (umem->writable && dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1); - else - put_user_page(page); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, umem->writable && dirty); } sg_free_table(&umem->sg_head); diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c index b89a9b9aef7a..469acb961fbd 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c @@ -118,10 +118,7 @@ int hfi1_acquire_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, size_t np void hfi1_release_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page **p, size_t npages, bool dirty) { - if (dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, npages); - else - put_user_pages(p, npages); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, npages, dirty); if (mm) { /* during close after signal, mm can be NULL */ atomic64_sub(npages, &mm->pinned_vm); diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c index bfbfbb7e0ff4..26c1fb8d45cc 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c @@ -37,15 +37,6 @@ #include "qib.h" -static void __qib_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages, - int dirty) -{ - if (dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages); - else - put_user_pages(p, num_pages); -} - /** * qib_map_page - a safety wrapper around pci_map_page() * @@ -124,7 +115,7 @@ int qib_get_user_pages(unsigned long start_page, size_t num_pages, return 0; bail_release: - __qib_release_user_pages(p, got, 0); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, got, false); bail: atomic64_sub(num_pages, ¤t->mm->pinned_vm); return ret; @@ -132,7 +123,7 @@ int qib_get_user_pages(unsigned long start_page, size_t num_pages, void qib_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages) { - __qib_release_user_pages(p, num_pages, 1); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages, true); /* during close after signal, mm can be NULL */ if (current->mm) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c index 0b0237d41613..62e6ffa9ad78 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c @@ -75,10 +75,7 @@ static void usnic_uiom_put_pages(struct list_head *chunk_list, int dirty) for_each_sg(chunk->page_list, sg, chunk->nents, i) { page = sg_page(sg); pa = sg_phys(sg); - if (dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1); - else - put_user_page(page); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, dirty); usnic_dbg("pa: %pa\n", &pa); } kfree(chunk); diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c index 67171c82b0c4..1e197753bf2f 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c @@ -60,20 +60,6 @@ struct siw_mem *siw_mem_id2obj(struct siw_device *sdev, int stag_index) return NULL; } -static void siw_free_plist(struct siw_page_chunk *chunk, int num_pages, - bool dirty) -{ - struct page **p = chunk->plist; - - while (num_pages--) { - if (!PageDirty(*p) && dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, 1); - else - put_user_page(*p); - p++; - } -} - void siw_umem_release(struct siw_umem *umem, bool dirty) { struct mm_struct *mm_s = umem->owning_mm; @@ -82,8 +68,9 @@ void siw_umem_release(struct siw_umem *umem, bool dirty) for (i = 0; num_pages; i++) { int to_free = min_t(int, PAGES_PER_CHUNK, num_pages); - siw_free_plist(&umem->page_chunk[i], to_free, - umem->writable && dirty); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(umem->page_chunk[i].plist, + to_free, + umem->writable && dirty); kfree(umem->page_chunk[i].plist); num_pages -= to_free; } diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 0334ca97c584..9759b6a24420 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1057,8 +1057,9 @@ static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page) put_page(page); } -void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages); -void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages); +void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, + bool make_dirty); + void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages); #if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c index 98f13ab37bac..7fefd7ab02c4 100644 --- a/mm/gup.c +++ b/mm/gup.c @@ -29,85 +29,70 @@ struct follow_page_context { unsigned int page_mask; }; -typedef int (*set_dirty_func_t)(struct page *page); - -static void __put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, - unsigned long npages, - set_dirty_func_t sdf) -{ - unsigned long index; - - for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) { - struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]); - - /* - * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with - * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key cases: - * - * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it skips - * the call to sdf(). That could happen because - * clear_page_dirty_for_io() called page_mkclean(), - * followed by set_page_dirty(). However, now the page is - * going to get written back, which meets the original - * intention of setting it dirty, so all is well: - * clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes on to call - * TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page back. - * - * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls sdf(). - * The page stays dirty, despite being written back, so it - * gets written back again in the next writeback cycle. - * This is harmless. - */ - if (!PageDirty(page)) - sdf(page); - - put_user_page(page); - } -} - /** - * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages - * @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released. + * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages + * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released. * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. + * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty * * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages() * variants called on that page. * * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a - * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release - * the page using put_user_page(). + * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously + * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(), + * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case. * * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. * - * set_page_dirty(), which does not lock the page, is used here. - * Therefore, it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that this is - * safe. If not, then put_user_pages_dirty_lock() should be called instead. + * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is + * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct, + * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it: + * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page(). * */ -void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages) +void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, + bool make_dirty) { - __put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty); + unsigned long index; -/** - * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages - * @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released. - * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. - * - * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a - * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release - * the page using put_user_page(). - * - * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. - * - * This is just like put_user_pages_dirty(), except that it invokes - * set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty(). - * - */ -void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages) -{ - __put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty_lock); + /* + * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is + * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a + * single operation to the head page should suffice. + */ + + if (!make_dirty) { + put_user_pages(pages, npages); + return; + } + + for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) { + struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]); + /* + * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with + * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key + * cases: + * + * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it + * skips the call to set_page_dirty(). That could happen + * because clear_page_dirty_for_io() called + * page_mkclean(), followed by set_page_dirty(). + * However, now the page is going to get written back, + * which meets the original intention of setting it + * dirty, so all is well: clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes + * on to call TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page + * back. + * + * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls + * set_page_dirty(). The page stays dirty, despite being + * written back, so it gets written back again in the + * next writeback cycle. This is harmless. + */ + if (!PageDirty(page)) + set_page_dirty_lock(page); + put_user_page(page); + } } EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock); -- 2.22.0