Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:52:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:52:15 -0500 Received: from praseodumium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.82]:63181 "EHLO praseodumium.btinternet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:51:56 -0500 From: davej@suse.de Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 19:51:52 +0000 (GMT) To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Fwd: CPU detection revamp (Request for comments)] In-Reply-To: <3A0C3C7F.FF594CE9@transmeta.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > That is actually correct -- the K6-2 doesn't actually have mtrr and sep, > but has syscall and k6_mtrr instead (the stepping bug causes k6_mtrr not > to show up.) Part of the bugginess of the old system was using one flag > for multiple purposes. This was Linux' doing, not AMD's, by the way. Yep, after the c->x86_mask = tfms & 15; change I got the correct stepping, and the flags are now correct:- features : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 pge mmx syscall 3dnow k6_mtrr regards, davej. -- | Dave Jones http://www.suse.de/~davej | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/