Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190802074620.115029-1-anup.patel@wdc.com> <20190802074620.115029-5-anup.patel@wdc.com>
 <9f30d2b6-fa2c-22ff-e597-b9fbd1c700ff@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <9f30d2b6-fa2c-22ff-e597-b9fbd1c700ff@redhat.com>
From:   Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Date:   Mon, 5 Aug 2019 11:18:34 +0530
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy16w+98VB7+DtVJOngABu2uUDmYmqURMsRBqzvKCQfGUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/19] RISC-V: Add initial skeletal KVM support
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Radim K <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:31 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/08/19 09:47, Anup Patel wrote:
> > +static void kvm_riscv_check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > +     if (kvm_request_pending(vcpu)) {
> > +             /* TODO: */
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * Clear IRQ_PENDING requests that were made to guarantee
> > +              * that a VCPU sees new virtual interrupts.
> > +              */
> > +             kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_IRQ_PENDING, vcpu);
> > +     }
> > +}
>
> This kvm_check_request can go away (as it does in patch 6).

Argh, I should have removed it in v2 itself.

Thanks for catching. I will update.

>
> > +int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
> > +     unsigned long scause, stval;
>
> You need to wrap this with srcu_read_lock/srcu_read_unlock, otherwise
> stage2_page_fault can access freed memslot arrays.  (ARM doesn't have
> this issue because it does not have to decode instructions on MMIO faults).

Looking at KVM ARM/ARM64, I was not sure about use of kvm->srcu. Thanks
for clarifying. I will use kvm->srcu like you suggested.

>
> That is,
>
>         vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
>
> > +     /* Process MMIO value returned from user-space */
> > +     if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO) {
> > +             ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run);
> > +             if (ret)
> > +                     return ret;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (run->immediate_exit)
> > +             return -EINTR;
> > +
> > +     vcpu_load(vcpu);
> > +
> > +     kvm_sigset_activate(vcpu);
> > +
> > +     ret = 1;
> > +     run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN;
> > +     while (ret > 0) {
> > +             /* Check conditions before entering the guest */
> > +             cond_resched();
> > +
> > +             kvm_riscv_check_vcpu_requests(vcpu);
> > +
> > +             preempt_disable();
> > +
> > +             local_irq_disable();
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * Exit if we have a signal pending so that we can deliver
> > +              * the signal to user space.
> > +              */
> > +             if (signal_pending(current)) {
> > +                     ret = -EINTR;
> > +                     run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
> > +             }
>
> Add an srcu_read_unlock here (and then the smp_store_mb can become
> smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock + WRITE_ONCE).

Sure, I will update.

>
>
> > +             /*
> > +              * Ensure we set mode to IN_GUEST_MODE after we disable
> > +              * interrupts and before the final VCPU requests check.
> > +              * See the comment in kvm_vcpu_exiting_guest_mode() and
> > +              * Documentation/virtual/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst
> > +              */
> > +             smp_store_mb(vcpu->mode, IN_GUEST_MODE);
> > +
> > +             if (ret <= 0 ||
> > +                 kvm_request_pending(vcpu)) {
> > +                     vcpu->mode = OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE;
> > +                     local_irq_enable();
> > +                     preempt_enable();
> > +                     continue;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             guest_enter_irqoff();
> > +
> > +             __kvm_riscv_switch_to(&vcpu->arch);
> > +
> > +             vcpu->mode = OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE;
> > +             vcpu->stat.exits++;
> > +
> > +             /* Save SCAUSE and STVAL because we might get an interrupt
> > +              * between __kvm_riscv_switch_to() and local_irq_enable()
> > +              * which can potentially overwrite SCAUSE and STVAL.
> > +              */
> > +             scause = csr_read(CSR_SCAUSE);
> > +             stval = csr_read(CSR_STVAL);
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * We may have taken a host interrupt in VS/VU-mode (i.e.
> > +              * while executing the guest). This interrupt is still
> > +              * pending, as we haven't serviced it yet!
> > +              *
> > +              * We're now back in HS-mode with interrupts disabled
> > +              * so enabling the interrupts now will have the effect
> > +              * of taking the interrupt again, in HS-mode this time.
> > +              */
> > +             local_irq_enable();
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * We do local_irq_enable() before calling guest_exit() so
> > +              * that if a timer interrupt hits while running the guest
> > +              * we account that tick as being spent in the guest. We
> > +              * enable preemption after calling guest_exit() so that if
> > +              * we get preempted we make sure ticks after that is not
> > +              * counted as guest time.
> > +              */
> > +             guest_exit();
> > +
> > +             preempt_enable();
>
> And another srcu_read_lock here.  Using vcpu->srcu_idx instead of a
> local variable also allows system_opcode_insn to wrap kvm_vcpu_block
> with a srcu_read_unlock/srcu_read_lock pair.

Okay.

>
> > +             ret = kvm_riscv_vcpu_exit(vcpu, run, scause, stval);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     kvm_sigset_deactivate(vcpu);
>
> And finally srcu_read_unlock here.

Okay.

Regards,
Anup