Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp2745955ybh; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 06:12:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxIZOvV8JyqGzzJaqzxyuH/ymrMUkFjQ0UBCvscr1cCtYxwOHEk1aJXOVjxqziJ08PnG5l1 X-Received: by 2002:a63:c246:: with SMTP id l6mr21120321pgg.210.1565010761081; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 06:12:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565010761; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gPKkticX/WSWu6vAC0wFyctd8zJa1jdqvo2lECf0RQZXotZNbT999xdO8nB3DYzc0R 5n9Vj4vZrKw2cwYPZ5iCD2ozCzaaQr2gp03OUGEfAfdJz0mGLQBhLzu/9HP/TNrwfngG bZM2dqk4HjRJRc4EFQDutFZIW7eFQAc7QtBi2Wiegx/60OZgcvVnhKHinJRmuOTemlGM TEb73u3EXsmqNToxvKs+d0VYfgje761hrgq28KZFIHYDWDcplpUUg+6tdHArsQhOCC8i ozG6g021AJ9xVGZyeouvCfS3WOhGafdC+ggp5akGnwOfP13ZFu9pzttd4Lysk2Dq7ePZ FnbA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=JFFTyEM56Rdghq72d15YX/BEQtRNtSBPOTt/XMvA18Y=; b=MKjSVggFRPJQCztNIICeew6D3wqwzvWlkp6iV6e30dLo04u/HPX8DsoTqUI65nTFCZ pZyGbGLND3rxW2VFya9x/7pxszeYDdhjAFC4BdvuAZwmT/Amc745cuQkB+1pwN4xfccd RF+f8bbjq0NZYr7FtKXMhJMdEW29jR0f/zPDFxWvVWl6OIdkqnZ1+11x+jratwX8myZH B8ZBLeblAKmZ6tOtFKdW4Uot229EFVxICtBmaRX5qB/4qiOknjkdlmLB8Ok9BGS567R5 EuJmOhEt04Ju3UCaYBLIS9pprRTrgUVkFDkweWdaqiN/luzc16Srpp0/fIQuvK4nx8/Z vWUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=PG2CPE79; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v10si44482805pgq.17.2019.08.05.06.12.24; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 06:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=PG2CPE79; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730480AbfHENLM (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:11:12 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50424 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729875AbfHENLK (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:11:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF5E32186A; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 13:11:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1565010669; bh=C3BKCTmCRN8NbJIBpcJImXNFNlZCvo5O6jaof3h0hO4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PG2CPE79I2WUunGVUeEKlWOfFRLFtOtnCJKd48JDDrAPVPDRvtfx8T9F/vKygKT61 6erHVrv2/a3zlxIIbq2qw0Sah4L0B9/6mRCo/9gnxL9yHbwIDT/a9hrP660Ob57kI1 XFaGqZ7BcepxK4IBcfaGJxLAHkNF7aiFXQxTZQb0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas Subject: [PATCH 4.19 59/74] arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 15:03:12 +0200 Message-Id: <20190805124940.628708569@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20190805124935.819068648@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190805124935.819068648@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Will Deacon commit 147b9635e6347104b91f48ca9dca61eb0fbf2a54 upstream. If CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} are 0b0000 then they must be interpreted to have their architecturally maximum values, which defeats the use of FTR_HIGHER_SAFE when sanitising CPU ID registers on heterogeneous machines. Introduce FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE so that these fields effectively saturate at zero. Fixes: 3c739b571084 ("arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers") Cc: # 4.4.x- Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Acked-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 7 ++++--- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 8 ++++++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -45,9 +45,10 @@ */ enum ftr_type { - FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */ - FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */ - FTR_HIGHER_SAFE,/* Bigger value is safe */ + FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */ + FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */ + FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe */ + FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe, but 0 is biggest */ }; #define FTR_STRICT true /* SANITY check strict matching required */ --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_c ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 31, 1, 1), /* RES1 */ ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_DIC_SHIFT, 1, 1), ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_IDC_SHIFT, 1, 1), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, CTR_CWG_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, CTR_ERG_SHIFT, 4, 0), + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, CTR_CWG_SHIFT, 4, 0), + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, CTR_ERG_SHIFT, 4, 0), ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_DMINLINE_SHIFT, 4, 1), /* * Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will @@ -449,6 +449,10 @@ static s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const st case FTR_LOWER_SAFE: ret = new < cur ? new : cur; break; + case FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE: + if (!cur || !new) + break; + /* Fallthrough */ case FTR_HIGHER_SAFE: ret = new > cur ? new : cur; break;