Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp2761052ybh; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 06:26:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxzJquU65RAs4twVhTFRVtatEyIZqYue/T1gbSKlCnpPuGkdYNX6R3d9lfnUqSqJ9YFKfhW X-Received: by 2002:a63:c055:: with SMTP id z21mr4722792pgi.380.1565011561355; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 06:26:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565011561; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XSL7FAkpYEPKDwUYE1675sB9R/HvtmGZEfXWI7BK02ON8WIV5TuEHqkZt605d9N/5/ yCzEewgWim7D+G1RdUpWWAApVlEYt2ojbc7yUTHjMC9Mf3iBt5s0cbOtM+NKcLcpK57z duEXPwjXAl3BCZfjtgpVX+fGp60j7/zuYX2K1qxa4BiXS2G9Xl3B9ihi7mIDPEsMBZcT oU3o4yU00m0zY1PIbld7pFfKLU+v9JcpgTynfC+t8i/s8j7dhcvjmE1OybFfyYFeIiXZ dGIvyFDUf432R6gfqHawjlrDz8it+FxeulTQpeIo1KNVO1YvhI58ewrjLv0xvIpIOV2w 6CSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=1uX5QZuHs7zwHLlpSXM4n3zLKC+Je2R1P/UK51AIphU=; b=QujeVgHRFGdDenc7rlnaGGeWLhQRX8ymi9ZiQSMBqR5i1V/n42uup4jiR+kNiwPSLX XOq8QRZfrHpYS8HmdCNNUeYcnoI9bL5Mwm6cGZ4ihkac040D66xr1qGd+mc1ViZpbMtU DfTICrkIIV6X1A2iKUbuPX+IZYPu5aqt4DpJW8EP3KCgKBTAw8hlEsqGSQ65coT5NJuf 91ulEXchHjZwFc75AqGbKd4lOpuggRfV03Hd9sO89n1+BvBIBaq1lSAPYg5IDQVZYznm eJ1NoaGPhtuWvQ2PDiH9bXhlw8sG6+w+4qsm/HK6pb7CunbyteV/yH3YyzGwnaqu55ZE sEzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=RAQLgEwb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si40513557plh.265.2019.08.05.06.25.45; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 06:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=RAQLgEwb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731153AbfHENZF (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:25:05 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33528 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731143AbfHENZD (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:25:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E43A220644; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 13:25:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1565011502; bh=MQLqQaDjbNLr0rNOSDiFbh7OC0xfgIjKgR+u66CvxM0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RAQLgEwbmzzsx6jLCLeoK3KkkklWG894EzCeO2y95oLTg1mCs+N0zLMqjVSLDXlw8 q6hakPT9gD4/aDMGgyQpTEGIdn89wprEWiz5/DgkaUXcqwtxcWlKLtQQvPmgzdSF10 7gen0duIJLXoTNWT4egOpGlxuYoYkuBiVmeOQUjw= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas Subject: [PATCH 5.2 113/131] arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 15:03:20 +0200 Message-Id: <20190805124959.533321614@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20190805124951.453337465@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190805124951.453337465@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Will Deacon commit 147b9635e6347104b91f48ca9dca61eb0fbf2a54 upstream. If CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} are 0b0000 then they must be interpreted to have their architecturally maximum values, which defeats the use of FTR_HIGHER_SAFE when sanitising CPU ID registers on heterogeneous machines. Introduce FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE so that these fields effectively saturate at zero. Fixes: 3c739b571084 ("arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers") Cc: # 4.4.x- Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Acked-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 7 ++++--- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 8 ++++++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -35,9 +35,10 @@ */ enum ftr_type { - FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */ - FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */ - FTR_HIGHER_SAFE,/* Bigger value is safe */ + FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */ + FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */ + FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe */ + FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe, but 0 is biggest */ }; #define FTR_STRICT true /* SANITY check strict matching required */ --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_c ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 31, 1, 1), /* RES1 */ ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_DIC_SHIFT, 1, 1), ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_IDC_SHIFT, 1, 1), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, CTR_CWG_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, CTR_ERG_SHIFT, 4, 0), + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, CTR_CWG_SHIFT, 4, 0), + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, CTR_ERG_SHIFT, 4, 0), ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_DMINLINE_SHIFT, 4, 1), /* * Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will @@ -468,6 +468,10 @@ static s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const st case FTR_LOWER_SAFE: ret = new < cur ? new : cur; break; + case FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE: + if (!cur || !new) + break; + /* Fallthrough */ case FTR_HIGHER_SAFE: ret = new > cur ? new : cur; break;