Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] MIPS: lantiq: add an irq_domain and irq_chip for EBU
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc:     tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, ralf@linux-mips.org,
        paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        john@phrozen.org, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
References: <20190727175315.28834-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
 <20190727175315.28834-4-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
 <86y30imq9p.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
 <CAFBinCCb4aTfuxaSrUp8xbUjjefi_qHOUJLjzH+acUTLY+6Geg@mail.gmail.com>
 <86o916mx2m.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <CAFBinCDRBmG39Pa4XBa2Bu8K6GH7iz_YyKoJ795XKTnEz2b4VQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Organization: Approximate
Message-ID: <f779fc72-ec40-214b-eb81-d21d6b15d5b3@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:03:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCDRBmG39Pa4XBa2Bu8K6GH7iz_YyKoJ795XKTnEz2b4VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03/08/2019 18:33, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 11:12 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:42:42 +0100,
>> Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> +static void ltq_ebu_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +     struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>>>>> +     struct irq_chip *irqchip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     chained_irq_enter(irqchip, desc);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(domain, 0));
>>>>
>>>> Having an irqdomain for a single interrupt is a bit over the top... Is
>>>> that for the convenience of the DT infrastructure?
>>> yes, I did it to get DT support
>>> please let me know if there's a "better" way (preferably with another
>>> driver as example)
>>
>> To be honest, the chained handler is what troubles me the most. You
>> normally would use such a construct if you had a multiplexer. In your
>> case, you have a 1:1 relationship between input and output. It is just
>> that this irqchip allows the trigger to be adapted, which normally
>> calls for a hierarchical implementation.
>>
>> In your case, with only a single interrupt, it doesn't matter much
>> though.
> I see, thank you for the explanation
> 
> can you name a driver for a hierarchical irqchip driver that you
> consider "clean" which I could use as reference?

Finding a "clean" driver is a challenge, as the world of IRQ controllers
is where both HW and SW engineers (me included) love to "innovate" ;-).

I'd recommend you have a look at drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-cirq.c, which
is almost as simple as it gets.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...