Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp2988998ybh; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:05:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxRE83k3pyalVhlcKvZrh//RVl8+/jHVzi6XMsBi5rEwFIxV8snnzOl9MB7pGzLRutCxBgw X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:21cc:: with SMTP id q70mr19828409pjc.56.1565024759843; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 10:05:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565024759; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dnh+7CkGICO9y9fpQ3+Jv1oTgOdSyk6SAhIgLpqbAiyrxe22yxubJHce4+xpreutNw d6oIgHnwgfrkqbuuydj88HhH3ini6IsnZSqGtNJ+YaUa97Bt0SdnRKaLvFgNk489Pqe2 tk0X5milDwTBIzxGCeWTEaIXqWOPxxrHm3Fm66D9MSb4pwjksg4dLeX7EraXRE/p1/U0 uKSWrB4rtenDShMgnfYFLNsOP0wb/3MAbrT5ZwVVS/mst3bbAvBkdBpJMPBC8GM1k284 05lqOLQcxEV+J4ByohBSUtnXHVA0P9dV1vJVD4x+dTWhZj7t0cNg+NSlUdbr01nvbqNw su5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=AmpTO/QAEpi7xKPU3YSTH9Kf1z+EUVEgjW9GTK/K5b4=; b=Ha8BBQNrSN3cNVRqEYpMRV5+gTUH9UMqCOaLqQCWXHx65iwnJon2r4QCY4MkBlHXll BeisTwB8w2i1/i2wTwyMaYM5Ex8Sv1wp93VXrh8HyKKSCoeBByCetD+upMTMKXAh6+25 XJzitxaszLEvS24J4JohNv9ujz8iJ0Ni/bcPznbeW1ybYnisNP+ufQZxmrsDn0zlVLuJ FCs5co5Y84T3yinxUERFEsUm9LMh8Sc6sE+ody9EEFNvZ6ykltNItV1uiCu2iSn8QFZI 3Z6KmnDORvMrXAgFbs6qARQ/fdYfY+OHq2ORJ+9EE9uOo1Xtupu1QvIfC+QYigtKuO8j VP8Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w21si46199807pff.263.2019.08.05.10.05.44; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 10:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729608AbfHERDu (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Aug 2019 13:03:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48968 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727830AbfHERDu (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2019 13:03:50 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 976D0369D3; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from masetto.com (ovpn-117-160.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.117.160]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6CB5DA21; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:03:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Al Stone To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Al Stone , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / CPPC: do not require the _PSD method when using CPPC Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 11:03:38 -0600 Message-Id: <20190805170338.29493-1-ahs3@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Mon, 05 Aug 2019 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org According to the ACPI 6.3 specification, the _PSD method is optional when using CPPC. The underlying assumption appears to be that each CPU can change frequency independently from all other CPUs; _PSD is provided to tell the OS that some processors can NOT do that. However, the acpi_get_psd() function returns -ENODEV if there is no _PSD method present, or an ACPI error status if an error occurs when evaluating _PSD, if present. This essentially makes _PSD mandatory when using CPPC, in violation of the specification, and only on Linux. This has forced some firmware writers to provide a dummy _PSD, even though it is irrelevant, but only because Linux requires it; other OSPMs follow the spec. We really do not want to have OS specific ACPI tables, though. So, correct acpi_get_psd() so that it does not return an error if there is no _PSD method present, but does return a failure when the method can not be executed properly. This allows _PSD to be optional as it should be. Signed-off-by: Al Stone Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index 15f103d7532b..e9ecfa13e997 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -365,10 +365,13 @@ static int acpi_get_psd(struct cpc_desc *cpc_ptr, acpi_handle handle) union acpi_object *psd = NULL; struct acpi_psd_package *pdomain; - status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(handle, "_PSD", NULL, &buffer, - ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE); - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) - return -ENODEV; + if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PSD")) { + status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(handle, "_PSD", NULL, + &buffer, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return -ENODEV; + } else + return 0; /* _PSD is optional */ psd = buffer.pointer; if (!psd || psd->package.count != 1) { -- 2.21.0