Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 5 Aug 2019 15:27:27 -0400
From:   Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Micah Morton <mortonm@chromium.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID MAINTAINERS file update for v5.3
Message-ID: <20190805192727.GA15470@chatter.i7.local>
References: <CAJ-EccMXEVktpuPS5BwkGqTo++dGcpHAuSUZo7WgJhAzFByz0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=whZzJ8WxAeHcirUghcbeOYxmpCr+XxeS9ngH3df3+=p2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-EccOqmmrf2KPb7Z7NU6bF_4W1XUawLLy=pLekCyFKqusjKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wgT7Z3kCbKS9Q1rdA=OVxPL32CdBovX=eHvD2PppWCHpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190805142756.GA4887@chatter.i7.local>
 <CAHk-=wgdiiBVprEVoi8+mpicGnOVNZ4Lb9YUJVskOXahO50sXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190805191136.GB4887@chatter.i7.local>
 <CAHk-=wg4xMXMM3EfW=NV6YuScA4zvcvaCAPou3bxegjGy6r-qA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wg4xMXMM3EfW=NV6YuScA4zvcvaCAPou3bxegjGy6r-qA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:17:49PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> However, I suspect that getting message-ids for all your pull 
>> requests
>> would significantly complicate your workflow.
>
>Yeah, that would be a noticeable annoyance. If I were to process pull
>requests the way I used to process emailed patches (ie "git am -s" on
>a mailbox) that would be a natural thing to perhaps do, but it's not
>at all how it ends up working. Having to save the pull request email
>to then process it with some script would turn it into a chore.
>
>I think the pr-tracker-bot clearly catches most cases as it is, and
>it's only the occasional "somebody did something odd" that then misses
>an automated response. Not a huge deal. For me it was actually more
>the "I didn't understand why the response didn't happen", not so much
>"I really want to always see responses".

Ok, let me add a fix for Re: at the start -- this won't make things
significantly more expensive, but will catch this particular corner 
case.

Best regards,
-K