Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp3277075ybh; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 15:29:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzg1wnjcH63Xm65hFtmQn2J0yjBXropLqKjYaO3T+6V808yFZFjIy71bszFVpFpJkDKRs2M X-Received: by 2002:a63:1b66:: with SMTP id b38mr174274pgm.54.1565044141857; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:29:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565044141; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MPaodnNjugqy16WxF57LnSbDdNcvMKKVaD4oxSJrkVbBjo21Z2YpSvJLF6mJCqzoQq U05AWLPeehwjWJa7nHVPDazHmRug0udj7jrxJWyvz/ImJBqHiEbmHWfoiOLtedi3ppPm VdJR533Imb3y6HEaOe+eZ1EdX5ajCW3Dsr9X5+xvKKjprQYO9KpT8mvqyw5Pj3Rmr4XP pX9cn56JNBca4SpkYoAlQoXzBTr5DuqO2NG+WUznFnGU+Q/60qV5DcOQgXwm2jVZhoqr 1GugIANkp5j7RRDslaOj1tEm6/szYhJWzIdolG8jZ7BSzp/U2QaBuEpmjbZCqv/WlHHO c7zQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=O7ol3Af3UOOFqacwpXB2Tkvb5T9+UO25EUzpB5YdSYk=; b=HIi3IQLUKEIV5HDVpkyQDU+nuZPuqQKDVtyy/Ls1RssAkcBtFOdyprRYKWJmRTDxUD NQtlIFR7J958BUkIaVyOzcwKEUME0COa2D7aR3cQoCAhMiqAumoqA1OtXWRBnMD2ID0D VSPCCAZerOgIOqfv/n5V5gYWHdpxoDVmgFPaO2f/wsIxlxlI2yk6oxzV455pjW656KCA gxkkyTCdgDGZSGW10jigKo9MR3DvDEo/f3Prs1iV5IY5vLvuCnn4iLgXt3o5+55dWuqK fqh1olpzccNn/vV5x/yFypUhQdeLfYW3+P8L4feWnG0y9f0SL4kgwHw/Il/yEWFnGaBo 1MLQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=yj6hr5hx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e13si48500165pfl.279.2019.08.05.15.28.46; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=yj6hr5hx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730971AbfHEW17 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:27:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:38457 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728483AbfHEW17 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:27:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id y15so40358566pfn.5 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:27:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O7ol3Af3UOOFqacwpXB2Tkvb5T9+UO25EUzpB5YdSYk=; b=yj6hr5hxUJenkSZp1UcIBWxZj3uBMngG0g469BpTJOQyhnZXP4os/nIQjFlCi4nBfz BmQi7zHWfdgEQcyU2IoxT1TtoUQy2VEGrifPAPymP6nVJlvoowBiSMDNU7tTuW6U7P8t Ljvd48h3GMeSX4XMq5QvRDtvsfFM/s6fi0+inxDc3s3tIqKrvRJjMvyvd4EsQGLmg7AK XKyd/PMO6i5wrhTRy+5/w6cd1LHKXcDpudtK7EZcxJVVB+f99JoaDzQGznpXdjko0hPs 4laB2/NlGZv487hyR6Iowl6ajy1SQiMhXKZKnNC6dqkySQWzX97V2x8QfcqVFF/FQD2f 6+WQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O7ol3Af3UOOFqacwpXB2Tkvb5T9+UO25EUzpB5YdSYk=; b=cn86ga703vaz8LPA2TMFQVWvAYhH5h9lfUlK/p+4N5DpDvFtTDOcT03RznCZNGJCWM 06ECjRTWdKjOVooR+T7nwqBH13uDjmZKEojG4Jf1oyMKItOpOUmMNjmKVUwZAsrKX0O0 UxwPdJEv0NtP972tMPpM+u3UA+q3H4fEUmRmpPfPR21ObO+p90AvQxNPK9ROss/ZK8YE JJdu1YmVVDWNkk4CWS5/I2DqucvtTGSbxWen9QYDUtGOqZ5nOhD4KifGZOZstBsE19Hd CuQM/5i5qkRYGgElm8paIWE2kE1ooj394IQflp7Sbbd5BzGMtb48lelzC4veNkZvZWL5 BZzA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVXANfl1r93WZOXCtMkYyNCvl8JDcqPKiS7MuOyUu0r8rCxGwJu ATmcGiuKnfz3kuP2zafZhUaw1w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2767:: with SMTP id o94mr9103pje.25.1565044078659; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder (104-188-17-28.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [104.188.17.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a12sm20255316pje.3.2019.08.05.15.27.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 15:27:55 -0700 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Vivek Gautam Cc: Will Deacon , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-arm-msm , open list , robh+dt , David Brown , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS , Joerg Roedel ," , Andy Gross , Robin Murphy Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Add atomic version of qcom_scm_call Message-ID: <20190805222755.GB2634@builder> References: <20190612071554.13573-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> <20190612071554.13573-2-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> <20190618175536.GI4270@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 19 Jun 04:34 PDT 2019, Vivek Gautam wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:25 PM Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:45:51PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > > There are scnenarios where drivers are required to make a > > > scm call in atomic context, such as in one of the qcom's > > > arm-smmu-500 errata [1]. > > > > > > [1] ("https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-4.9/commit/ > > > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c?h=CogSystems-msm-49/ > > > msm-4.9&id=da765c6c75266b38191b38ef086274943f353ea7") > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam > > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson > > > --- > > > drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c > > > index 91d5ad7cf58b..b6dca32c5ac4 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c > > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c > > [snip] > > > > + > > > +static void qcom_scm_call_do(const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc, > > > + struct arm_smccc_res *res, u32 fn_id, > > > + u64 x5, bool atomic) > > > +{ > > > > Maybe pass in the call type (ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL vs ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL) > > instead of "bool atomic"? Would certainly make the callsites easier to > > understand. > > Sure, will do that. > > > > > > + int retry_count = 0; > > > + > > > + if (!atomic) { > > > + do { > > > + mutex_lock(&qcom_scm_lock); > > > + > > > + __qcom_scm_call_do(desc, res, fn_id, x5, > > > + ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL); > > > + > > > + mutex_unlock(&qcom_scm_lock); > > > + > > > + if (res->a0 == QCOM_SCM_V2_EBUSY) { > > > + if (retry_count++ > QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_MAX_RETRY) > > > + break; > > > + msleep(QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_WAIT_MS); > > > + } > > > + } while (res->a0 == QCOM_SCM_V2_EBUSY); > > > + } else { > > > + __qcom_scm_call_do(desc, res, fn_id, x5, ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL); > > > + } > > > > Is it safe to make concurrent FAST calls? > > I better add a spinlock here. > Hi Vivek, Would you be able to respin this patch, so that we could unblock the introduction of the display nodes in the various device? Regards, Bjorn