Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   chenzefeng <chenzefeng2@huawei.com>
To:     <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        <tglx@linutronix.de>, <allison@lohutok.net>, <jeyu@kernel.org>,
        <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        <chenzefeng2@huawei.com>, <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm:unwind: fix backtrace error with unwind_table
Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 15:32:36 +0800
Message-ID: <1565076756-71682-1-git-send-email-chenzefeng2@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

For arm, when load_module success, the mod->init_layout.base would
be free in function do_free_init, but do not remove it's unwind table
from the unwind_tables' list. And later the above mod->init_layout.base
would alloc for another module's text section, and add to the
unwind_tables which cause one address can found more than two unwind table
in the unwind_tables' list, therefore may get to errror unwind table to
backtrace, and get an error backtrace.

Signed-off-by: chenzefeng <chenzefeng2@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/module.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
index deef17f..a4eb5f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/module.c
@@ -403,14 +403,24 @@ int module_finalize(const Elf32_Ehdr *hdr, const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void
-module_arch_cleanup(struct module *mod)
-{
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND
+void module_arch_cleanup(struct module *mod)
+{
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARM_SEC_MAX; i++)
-		if (mod->arch.unwind[i])
+		if (mod->arch.unwind[i]) {
 			unwind_table_del(mod->arch.unwind[i]);
-#endif
+			mod->arch.unwind[i] = NULL;
+		}
 }
+
+void module_arch_freeing_init(struct module *mod)
+{
+	if (mod->arch.unwind[ARM_SEC_INIT]) {
+		unwind_table_del(mod->arch.unwind[ARM_SEC_INIT]);
+		mod->arch.unwind[ARM_SEC_INIT] = NULL;
+	}
+}
+#endif
-- 
1.8.5.6