Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp3748676ybh; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:39:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwc8rdxHG8xxK8FPn0ocuf2tEc3fwqlT3o9X6RXZ57sR4eitY/bUVlkqc/aLSuqnQJ/2qAj X-Received: by 2002:a63:6bc5:: with SMTP id g188mr1823966pgc.225.1565077148620; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:39:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565077148; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qrdICfb6DfACx4+u/neRyvhaNQrdaukIsiR3eWtD1kxV9A1oVZRcbSNHAOPWBGicku tEpH8x9ixRR2QKul6tSUHbQ3k6qq6yZjpToVLFP/HiTdBRgounDIetztPatq23ccOV+T 82mQjz+/LblI8AVOUrEJONAhpJcv4QTKHGn0OIJvL2ZmzxqppAeyZsEDnvsL7JK0DBAj sWYrmad0CD5WMn5/97jQ60/tB2CBe9db/WN/IBnXq+FJlt3VLUsipPtKvjzOP3rM9NKA a/ebylIb04C3zJVQSGoeMU15C2R3G1aH5qad5SejdcKi+qfX8tWdfVGUd3SbWIl2fm9P Ra5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=vJW7w2hZLSxzg7o+uIAszwA6zwFNEzlTnIB/U1IKy3Y=; b=sYEzp0x4o3ZU4RiASbjRmiAG8FBCss/TMcoSWUGYkZV+BhiCPw9zzC7o2GEwTwHBfI WWB0f+hjIbI3wgixZ80bSvYJ2HOrX6jGpkaWhBQpAU3jnUQ3GwR5gpmNzapSUn5gjPsB HnTcD/KWTF8HpkuD/L/U5dOOAg62TQZI79hespxJcA7RSBCEMS2SNfOfHR+LFjJ8iB+2 kN0+yAvsNbzDseOfqTTyJcbk1ZZX08KoQ9al/KpDsUjTOT3yHX2XymEf3Xubu4FeFKG8 7fs7h9mpfVJxQZRNCWjXl+aSPxOiekhqaCbStWs/ItID05xeFauC1Cfhm+gq8R4yiHlS fXSw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l36si20132472pgb.292.2019.08.06.00.38.53; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732088AbfHFHg3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 03:36:29 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35596 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728798AbfHFHg2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 03:36:28 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922ECAD7F; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 07:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:36:24 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: Johannes Weiner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Davydov Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm/memcontrol: reclaim severe usage over high limit in get_user_pages loop Message-ID: <20190806073624.GD11812@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <156431697805.3170.6377599347542228221.stgit@buzz> <20190729154952.GC21958@cmpxchg.org> <20190729185509.GI9330@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190802094028.GG6461@dhcp22.suse.cz> <105a2f1f-de5c-7bac-3aa5-87bd1dbcaed9@yandex-team.ru> <20190802114438.GH6461@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190806070728.GB11812@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 06-08-19 10:19:49, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > On 8/6/19 10:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 02-08-19 13:44:38, Michal Hocko wrote: > > [...] > > > > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > > > > > index ba9138a4a1de..53a35c526e43 100644 > > > > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > > > > > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > > > > > @@ -2429,8 +2429,12 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask, > > > > > schedule_work(&memcg->high_work); > > > > > break; > > > > > } > > > > > - current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch; > > > > > - set_notify_resume(current); > > > > > + if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask)) { > > > > > + reclaim_high(memcg, nr_pages, GFP_KERNEL); > > > > > > ups, this should be s@GFP_KERNEL@gfp_mask@ > > > > > > > > + } else { > > > > > + current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch; > > > > > + set_notify_resume(current); > > > > > + } > > > > > break; > > > > > } > > > > > } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))); > > > > > > > > > Should I send an official patch for this? > > > > I prefer to keep it as is while we have no better solution. Fine with me. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs