Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 6 Aug 2019 20:40:55 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
        jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
        dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
        oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback
 queueing
Message-ID: <20190806204055.088ba246@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20190807003501.GX28441@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20190802151435.GA1081@linux.ibm.com>
        <20190802151501.13069-2-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
        <20190807000313.GA161170@google.com>
        <20190807003501.GX28441@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 17:35:01 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> > > +	// Don't use ->nocb_bypass during early boot.  
> > 
> > Very minor nit: comment style should be /* */  
> 
> I thought that Linus said that "//" was now OK.  Am I confused?

Have a link?

-- Steve