Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932252AbVLMAzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:55:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932291AbVLMAzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:55:50 -0500 Received: from gw02.applegatebroadband.net ([207.55.227.2]:53497 "EHLO data.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932252AbVLMAzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:55:50 -0500 Message-ID: <439E1BBE.4040405@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:54:22 -0800 From: George Anzinger Reply-To: george@mvista.com Organization: MontaVista Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.7.12-1.3.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: john stultz CC: Shailabh Nagar , Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel , elsa-devel , lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, ckrm-tech , Guillaume Thouvenin , Jay Lan , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][Patch 1/5] nanosecond timestamps and diffs References: <43975D45.3080801@watson.ibm.com> <43975E6D.9000301@watson.ibm.com> <439DD01A.2060803@watson.ibm.com> <1134416962.14627.7.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <439DD6E8.7010802@watson.ibm.com> <1134418034.14627.14.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1134418034.14627.14.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2348 Lines: 62 john stultz wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 20:00 +0000, Shailabh Nagar wrote: > >>john stultz wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 19:31 +0000, Shailabh Nagar wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Christoph Lameter wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Shailabh Nagar wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>+void getnstimestamp(struct timespec *ts) >>>>> >>>>>There is already getnstimeofday in the kernel. >>>> >>>>Yes, and that function is being used within the getnstimestamp() being proposed. >>>>However, John Stultz had advised that getnstimeofday could get affected by calls to >>>>settimeofday and had recommended adjusting the getnstimeofday value with wall_to_monotonic. >>>> >>>>John, could you elaborate ? >>> >>>I think you pretty well have it covered. >>> >>>getnstimeofday + wall_to_monotonic should be higher-res and more >>>reliable (then TSC based sched_clock(), for example) for getting a >>>timestamp. >>> >>>There may be performance concerns as you have to access the clock >>>hardware in getnstimeofday(), but there really is no other way for >>>reliable finely grained monotonically increasing timestamps. >>> > > >>Thanks, that clarifies. I guess the other underlying concern here would be whether these >>improvements (in resolution and reliability) should be going into getnstimeofday() >>itself (rather than creating a new func for the same) ? Or is it better to leave >>getnstimeofday as it is ? > > > No, getnstimeofday() is very much needed to get a nanosecond grained > wall-time clock, so a new function is needed for the monotonic clock. > > In my timeofday re-work I have used the name "get_monotonic_clock()" and > "get_monotonic_clock_ts()" for basically the same functionality > (providing a ktime and a timespec respectively). You might consider > naming it as such, but resolving these naming collisions shouldn't be > too difficult either way. Indeed. Lets use a name with "monotonic" in it, please. And, possibly not "clock". How about get_nsmonotonic_time() or some such? -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/