Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932309AbVLMA5l (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:57:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932308AbVLMA5l (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:57:41 -0500 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:4852 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932305AbVLMA5k (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:57:40 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation From: Daniel Walker To: David Howells Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, hch@infradead.org, arjan@infradead.org, matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:57:38 -0800 Message-Id: <1134435458.22269.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 900 Lines: 22 On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 23:45 +0000, David Howells wrote: > (1) Provides a simple xchg() based semaphore as a default for all > architectures that don't wish to override it and provide their own. > > Overriding is possible by setting CONFIG_ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_MUTEX and > supplying asm/mutex.h > > Partial overriding is possible by #defining mutex_grab(), mutex_release() > and is_mutex_locked() to perform the appropriate optimised functions. Your code is really similar to the RT mutex, which does everything that your mutex does at least ? Assuming you've reviewed the RT mutex, why would we want to use yours over it? Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/