Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 7 Aug 2019 09:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
To:     Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: kbuild: add virtual memory system selection
In-Reply-To: <c331e389-5f33-634a-f62f-e48251ca4cfe@ghiti.fr>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1908070940110.13971@viisi.sifive.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1907261259420.26670@viisi.sifive.com> <20190802084453.GA1410@infradead.org> <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1908061648220.13971@viisi.sifive.com> <20190807054246.GB1398@infradead.org> <c331e389-5f33-634a-f62f-e48251ca4cfe@ghiti.fr>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:

> And FYI my series and your patch are already in linux-next.

Yes, I agree with Christoph that it would be preferable not to break 
randconfig/allyesconfig.  So if you don't mind, could you respin the 
RISC-V patch to drop the Sv48 portion, and simply assume Sv39 for RV64 as 
we do for the rest of the RISC-V kernel code?  We can always add Sv48 
back in later.

If you agree, then once you do that, I'll ask Andrew to drop the RISC-V 
Kbuild patch that he's carrying.


- Paul