Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=c4=93tnieks?=" <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc:     netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c - make tables static
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:   Thu, 08 Aug 2019 01:43:22 -0400
Message-ID: <55481.1565243002@turing-police>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Sparse warns about two tables not being declared.

  CHECK   net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c:725:26: warning: symbol 'nf_nat_ipv4_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c:964:26: warning: symbol 'nf_nat_ipv6_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?

And in fact they can indeed be static.

Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
index 7ac733ebd060..0a59c14b5177 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ nf_nat_ipv4_local_fn(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-const struct nf_hook_ops nf_nat_ipv4_ops[] = {
+static const struct nf_hook_ops nf_nat_ipv4_ops[] = {
 	/* Before packet filtering, change destination */
 	{
 		.hook		= nf_nat_ipv4_in,
@@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ nf_nat_ipv6_local_fn(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-const struct nf_hook_ops nf_nat_ipv6_ops[] = {
+static const struct nf_hook_ops nf_nat_ipv6_ops[] = {
 	/* Before packet filtering, change destination */
 	{
 		.hook		= nf_nat_ipv6_in,