Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp544081ybl; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:47:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxFQMb9bwn0yoBSfB5Ytgz6fSIGRn+mxz9f3c272mmpOTKTv70q29/SPbYqVmdCvXt0nZWh X-Received: by 2002:a63:c013:: with SMTP id h19mr18417006pgg.108.1565369278817; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:47:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565369278; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Y3+nJyEgeMWzaxUTjOnqhaPW6bJT2Um6hAD4b5qJ4kZxsQrfx+QNYcCZg0k3tQO+ia IZn6icNLWZ7SbY51fMPTehr9gUWTRorzavgsL6LOcXuS0fpUEEAu7rjzinUocWDgla3X K8KqoOWW4jonTLRWDuNmZNQSrX3twg21lpFglrC+wB8UbkmsBnUnea1qOWulPZei1DZv DA0Gw0LQ4HymqEU2ZH7q6IyE+yQpIs+YyJHp9UJTOo/vPrNKiAAF9uEZIPx29+x3Sl3R 838M7GSsQA27jjjU3rTYk8pq9/S1zGc3rnWdNPQKepRbSxuKpCpSV8votUSUftJefzKU i5LA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=0PKOj/ksMJyTt3LyT/YAxm3dCasBuI7DjiSXQ6l8JOM=; b=CfMRf6RHnqBn87AnY/jftlkG9kq7y71QVuJ9sYyCixPg9nguzrR7My34e5nzhE3WBO SMh2ebQ+OcucGVqb8oqYkvnXJEyZJD2R5xJPAZsSDNDuSgrdavpgcjUrKklW4WHRKQ3p pYo+M/K1p48ABtFfEmgyWqOGpdi4BX/ipq3iSTPeoD1CrfZ0u5wU1IZdq75r+bTrIMNz YrR8Ymac+QrPFKvholblvARGyZAsDqiWcpVjI9h8nu+85SfuLnkb05dTRnom/ItcjLGE sZhFeYV8vRvnacv8iT/CmKIighhyIpjx1Im/CpTlvTWkCoOV5s9lCz5ppWkvsEgMkqNw CPxA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b74si55597744pfb.281.2019.08.09.09.47.44; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436732AbfHIPis (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:38:48 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:49068 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726255AbfHIPis (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:38:48 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729A915A2; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dawn-kernel.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [10.1.197.116]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFC3B3F575; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: Serialize enabling/disabling a link device. To: yabinc@google.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190808191726.65806-1-yabinc@google.com> From: Suzuki K Poulose Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 16:38:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190808191726.65806-1-yabinc@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi,- On 08/08/2019 20:17, Yabin Cui wrote: > When tracing etm data of multiple threads on multiple cpus through perf > interface, some link devices are shared between paths of different cpus. > It creates race conditions when different cpus wants to enable/disable > the same link device at the same time. > > Example 1: > Two cpus want to enable different ports of a coresight funnel, thus > calling the funnel enable operation at the same time. But the funnel > enable operation isn't reentrantable. > > Example 2: > For an enabled coresight dynamic replicator with refcnt=1, one cpu wants > to disable it, while another cpu wants to enable it. Ideally we still have > an enabled replicator with refcnt=1 at the end. But in reality the result > is uncertain. > > Since coresight devices claim themselves when enabled for self-hosted > usage, the race conditions above usually make the link devices not usable > after many cycles. > > To fix the race conditions, this patch adds a spinlock to serialize > enabling/disabling a link device. > > Signed-off-by: Yabin Cui > --- > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c | 8 ++++++++ > include/linux/coresight.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c > index 55db77f6410b..90f97f4f99b2 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c > @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ static int coresight_enable_link(struct coresight_device *csdev, > int ret; > int link_subtype; > int refport, inport, outport; > + unsigned long flags; > > if (!parent || !child) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -274,15 +275,18 @@ static int coresight_enable_link(struct coresight_device *csdev, > if (refport < 0) > return refport; > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&csdev->spinlock, flags); > if (atomic_inc_return(&csdev->refcnt[refport]) == 1) { > if (link_ops(csdev)->enable) { > ret = link_ops(csdev)->enable(csdev, inport, outport); > if (ret) { > atomic_dec(&csdev->refcnt[refport]); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&csdev->spinlock, flags); > return ret; > } > } > } > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&csdev->spinlock, flags); > > csdev->enable = true; > > @@ -296,6 +300,7 @@ static void coresight_disable_link(struct coresight_device *csdev, > int i, nr_conns; > int link_subtype; > int refport, inport, outport; > + unsigned long flags; > > if (!parent || !child) > return; > @@ -315,10 +320,12 @@ static void coresight_disable_link(struct coresight_device *csdev, > nr_conns = 1; > } > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&csdev->spinlock, flags); > if (atomic_dec_return(&csdev->refcnt[refport]) == 0) { > if (link_ops(csdev)->disable) > link_ops(csdev)->disable(csdev, inport, outport); > } > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&csdev->spinlock, flags); You may also want to protect the refcount checks below with the same lock, just to be consistent. With that : Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose