Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190527200627.8635-1-peron.clem@gmail.com> <CAJiuCcfUhBxEr=o7VVpPROQZadQh7z1QC0SkWSYt-53Sj3H2qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJiuCcc3_1jZWV7G3+fFQYRZ8b6qcAbnH+K6pkRvww6_D=OMAw@mail.gmail.com> <20190715193842.GC4503@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20190715193842.GC4503@sirena.org.uk>
From:   =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUMOpcm9u?= <peron.clem@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:45:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJiuCceYDnyxRLLLLy6Dn6DLTZ+NmSaUnoX1Vmzvgiy0XvF_Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Allwinner H6 SPDIF support
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
        Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

Sorry, I just discovered that the ASoC patches have been merged into
the broonie and linus tree in 5.3.

I'm still quite new in the sending of patches to the Kernel but
souldn't be a ack or a mail sent to warn the sender when the series
are accepted?

Should 5/6/7 patches be picked by Sunxi maintainer?

Thanks,
Cl=C3=A9ment


On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 21:38, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 09:21:01PM +0200, Cl=C3=A9ment P=C3=A9ron wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm missing ACK from ASoC Maintainers patch 2-3-4.
> >
> > It's really small paches, if you could have a look at it.
>
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
>
> Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> for the subsystem are normally handled.