Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp3410742ybl; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 23:20:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxXsa4XazcBNPVjtUW92/Ex4CGr8QaWtMr5lGWsntZm4ALOx8B0zsEdv3Xq0PeevLVfmZVx X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c714:: with SMTP id o20mr10757937pjt.50.1565590826276; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 23:20:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565590826; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Xn0ql7zyZiEnZmqQwk9Lk8xaT3hV3bEMkM9eRXszSduoiqVDjEg8R0n3Apk/s3BhCY KyiS+gOXswe0UPeon/HVHF3Qi6VX2L7amo/T4nqugUtwEczJncN5vtGD6TwY/nxHhIvA hRRfhsj7COf1rCI8SCaS77ehef35VBgeoAL333wK6igDE1i2KDqR2Un6mu/YsW2CC3DC e1hAog+vLkEvKOfwS1Jh7dNQJf+XwvM7HZvsP58i5hNBlW3TaTP2PZzn2Y8ZzEt6afjC 9gz5s6fvierggd+i8YPFXenKOZfYAWC0ItQTOGb5LbJO0TzzwgrkV93M4BNCtsYnqSvA Ahew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=XFUGh5DX7bd9MigvfuecDBloPvyg7j61NM5Cy4iW9A4=; b=lEfL8nwIj5PUJ4SLB1HmtT9H/jZoOGSLoDjfLUioSCFAvWizz97TZb4nNphxe47ypN pRTsXmU2V3sKYdZ2OH+HVVZXeIsJTPEL7mhQKxLw3hPF2OFoELEcobMmU5htqJ4BYU3K WAxmCqkWLJLnVlMuhMpMgbSUQGxcSep6f8/WSw5+xALMCOqzZxraKAdIJu3lhFGqlSMF Ud8tq+X50bb+IzGCdRJSGxPEG8T7ZFmNEvT/xQzOpAhBqrNdf29AXunliBRw6IGO4sqS qVdf3G75k4/kMHvaEwO28I2KPP31cu/unWfRBluz6lKUUW9u5Egw6tHAgrsVm/D5K+q3 O5SA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a95si9555990pla.2.2019.08.11.23.20.10; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 23:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726972AbfHLGSK (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:10 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:2774 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725822AbfHLGSH (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7C66nrR038018 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:06 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ub283rwtv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:18:05 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:18:04 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:17:59 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7C6HxiO38011134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:17:59 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF31FAE051; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D106AE056; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.8.59]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:17:56 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= , Jerome Glisse , Jason Gunthorpe , Steven Price , Linux-MM , Linux List Kernel Mailing Subject: Re: cleanup the walk_page_range interface References: <20190808154240.9384-1-hch@lst.de> <20190808215632.GA12773@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190808215632.GA12773@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19081206-0020-0000-0000-0000035EB031 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19081206-0021-0000-0000-000021B3BDAF Message-Id: <20190812061756.GA28471@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-08-12_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908120068 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:56:32PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Note that both Thomas and Steven have series touching this area pending, > > > and there are a couple consumer in flux too - the hmm tree already > > > conflicts with this series, and I have potential dma changes on top of > > > the consumers in Thomas and Steven's series, so we'll probably need a > > > git tree similar to the hmm one to synchronize these updates. > > > > I'd be willing to just merge this now, if that helps. The conversion > > is mechanical, and my only slight worry would be that at least for my > > original patch I didn't build-test the (few) non-x86 > > architecture-specific cases. But I did end up looking at them fairly > > closely (basically using some grep/sed scripts to see that the > > conversions I did matched the same patterns). And your changes look > > like obvious improvements too where any mistake would have been caught > > by the compiler. > > I did cross compile the s390 and powerpc bits, but I do not have an > openrisc compiler. The openrisc defconfig builds fine. > > So I'm not all that worried from a functionality standpoint, and if > > this will help the next merge window, I'll happily pull now. > > That would help with this series vs the others, but not with the other > series vs each other. > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.