Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030269AbVLMWSM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:18:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030270AbVLMWSM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:18:12 -0500 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:49937 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030269AbVLMWSL (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:18:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:18:10 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu, dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, hch@infradead.org, arjan@infradead.org, matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation Message-ID: <20051213221810.GU23349@stusta.de> References: <20051212161944.3185a3f9.akpm@osdl.org> <20051213075441.GB6765@elte.hu> <20051213075835.GZ15804@wotan.suse.de> <20051213004257.0f87d814.akpm@osdl.org> <20051213084926.GN23384@wotan.suse.de> <20051213010126.0832356d.akpm@osdl.org> <20051213090517.GQ23384@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051213090517.GQ23384@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1463 Lines: 44 On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:05:18AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:01:26AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > > Can you please apply the following patch then? > > > > > > Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement > > > > OK. > > > > Thus far I have this: > > Would it be possible to drop support for gcc 3.0 too? > AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the > advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make > the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain. 3.2+ would be better than 3.1+ Remember that 3.2 would have been named 3.1.2 if there wasn't the C++ ABI change, and I don't remember any big Linux distribution actually using gcc 3.1 as default compiler. And since gcc 3.2 was released one and a half years before kernel 2.6.0, I doubt there's any distribution both supporting kernel 2.6 and not shipping any gcc >= 3.2 . > -Andi cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/