Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190805142706.22520-1-keith.busch@intel.com> <20190805142706.22520-4-keith.busch@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190805142706.22520-4-keith.busch@intel.com>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:59:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hCkibcbiYdPmBXdnDHZbGP2q0uNRi01oU0NMz5o3WwGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] acpi/hmat: Skip publishing target info for nodes with
 no online memory
To:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 4:30 PM Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
> There are multiple scenarios where the HMAT may contain information
> about proximity domains that are not currently online. Rather than fail
> to report any HMAT data just elide those offline domains.
>
> If and when those domains are later onlined they can be added to the
> HMEM reporting at that point.
>
> This was found while testing EFI_MEMORY_SP support which reserves
> "specific purpose" memory from the general allocation pool. If that
> reservation results in an empty numa-node then the node is not marked
> online leading a spurious:
>
>     "acpi/hmat: Ignoring HMAT: Invalid table"
>
> ...result for HMAT parsing.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

When you send somebody else's patches, you should sign them off as a
rule, but since you sent this one with your own R-by, I converted that
to a S-o-b.