Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:05:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:05:34 -0400 Received: from c009-h018.c009.snv.cp.net ([209.228.34.131]:24738 "HELO c009.snv.cp.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:05:31 -0400 X-Sent: 9 Oct 2001 17:05:56 GMT Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:07:05 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jeffrey W. Baker" X-X-Sender: To: "Trever L. Adams" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems In-Reply-To: <1002646705.2177.9.camel@aurora> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9 Oct 2001, Trever L. Adams wrote: > I am seeing messages such as: > > Oct 9 12:52:51 smeagol kernel: Firewall:IN=ppp0 OUT= MAC= > SRC=64.152.2.36 DST=MY_IP_ADDRESS LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=246 > ID=1093 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=80 DPT=33157 WINDOW=34752 RES=0x00 ACK FIN > URGP=0 > > In my firewall logs. I see them for ACK RST as well. These are valid > connections. My rules follow for the most part (a few allowed > connections to the machine in question have been removed from the > list). This often leaves open connections in a half closed state on > machines behind this firewall. It also some times kills totally open > connections and I see packets rejected that should be allowed through. I see this too. iptables is refusing packets on locally-initiated TCP connections when the RELATED,ESTABLISHED rule should be letting them through. I mentioned this problem on the netfilter list but my message fell into a black hole and was apparently beyond the horizon of the developers. -jwb - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/