Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: virtio_rpmsg_bus: replace "%p" with "%pK"
To:     "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
CC:     <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
References: <20181024011909.21674-1-s-anna@ti.com>
 <1cc3d697-6fde-901b-2e35-2e2b53b44425@ti.com>
 <2ef5e274-df09-c3a0-41ed-a945d1902eaf@ti.com>
 <92dc4403-8782-8dbf-b912-cc832ac748a7@ti.com>
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Message-ID: <ea1efb4e-43be-4efc-10f8-9d182313bf12@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:39:27 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <92dc4403-8782-8dbf-b912-cc832ac748a7@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 8/12/19 11:36 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 8/12/19 12:28 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>> On 8/12/19 10:47 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>>> On 10/23/18 9:19 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>> The virtio_rpmsg_bus driver uses the "%p" format-specifier for
>>>> printing the vring buffer address. This prints only a hashed
>>>> pointer even for previliged users. Use "%pK" instead so that
>>>> the address can be printed during debug using kptr_restrict
>>>> sysctl.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> s/previliged/privileged
>>
>> Bjorn,
>> Can you fix this up when applying.
>>
>>>
>>> You describe what the code does, but not why you need this. %pK is used
>>> for only about 1% of pointer printing, why do you want to leak this
>>> address to userspace at all?
>>
>> Andrew,
>> Default behavior of %pK is same as %p, but it does allow you to control
>> the print. The reason is clearly mentioned in the last sentence in the
>> patch description.
>>
> 
> 
> Let me rephrase then, why would you ever set 'kptr_restrict' to anything
> other than 0, or why do you want to be able to leak this address to
> userspace at all? If the answer is just because you can, then all 12,000
> instances of %p in kernel could be converted for the same reason.

It is a dev_dbg statement, so it is already under dynamic debug control.
We would only ever use it during debug.

regards
Suman

> 
> Andrew
> 
> 
>> regards
>> Suman
>>
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
>>>> index f29dee731026..1345f373a1a0 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
>>>> @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>>>  		goto vqs_del;
>>>>  	}
>>>>  
>>>> -	dev_dbg(&vdev->dev, "buffers: va %p, dma %pad\n",
>>>> +	dev_dbg(&vdev->dev, "buffers: va %pK, dma %pad\n",
>>>>  		bufs_va, &vrp->bufs_dma);
>>>>  
>>>>  	/* half of the buffers is dedicated for RX */
>>>>
>>