Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:52:02 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
Cc:     Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
        Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] mfd: ioc3: Add driver for SGI IOC3 chip
Message-ID: <20190812125202.46608b74@cakuba.netronome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190811093212.88635fb1a6c796a073ec71ff@suse.de>
References: <20190809103235.16338-1-tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
        <20190809103235.16338-8-tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
        <20190809142222.4558691e@cakuba.netronome.com>
        <20190811093212.88635fb1a6c796a073ec71ff@suse.de>
Organization: Netronome Systems, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 09:32:12 +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > Also please don't use stdint types in the kernel, please try checkpatch
> > to catch coding style issues.  
> 
> my patch already reduces them and checkpatch only warns about usage of printk
> for the network part. Changing that to dev_warn/dev_err in the mfd patch didn't
> seem the right thing to do. As I'm splitting the conversion patch into a few
> steps I could also replace the printks.

Thanks for looking into it. I was referring to the use of uint32_t
instead of u32. Perhaps checkpatch has to be motivated with the --strict
option to point those out?