Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp262402ybl; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:58:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxLB+Drf5o7IPbeityaR8l96Qpl5juGouwkTDv2jYhbodkJnkFQKOp6njRQn37YVZTholdH X-Received: by 2002:a63:d84e:: with SMTP id k14mr32124208pgj.234.1565650726858; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:58:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565650726; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UGC5JMBGcPXPFhBx8kbzEeiIB3bXx6D9iAKYtsI3R2JD7GwKcxtlzZ89xJPjqo1/DI /SGIk2LMVfZX/HKT1BCOJmJ6G8A1TrKwbRVqs4aKW7R0GHKz4CqKTB9tLN+nC4V+R5Nr /4XfdO6v3H5Oq2ApVY8DOh3lG33R+9KXkWrYjBRCoQPi35n7AfU/AG5u6l2mW6QNp7Sj dUGsAsNzY5hrBw2jFeMQqgbvsaobVNoHjbNcJXeNObV4ZVtQAk/yFLfCmbSpzegnDvu5 DS3TiRX1pRUrjKBPTDjrSGbhUf0vZzCDkWvv+Q7AdimhKEsBQlN1pCQu7lySnXJSUzvF shUg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=bjZBUUnNFxwJGlVfiZU7+VhObtD1C6m0LDp2PvbJtzg=; b=Skbz5g8BACB/sfxAryVaDrnhx3J8/ZC/dGXTBmCAz8wWRx09yllUu7Iy/fVIniRpQw UXWcuQXqYorGk4s3EksPTXu7oP5FB4AaOaUr/02hUdpDCkszEdHlgithcpBdBhR0DZmA K3e2UtHCaDEkgLC5iZHBMfrRlwIfbeWvgWZmcD4Whu8HoRvMt39CTinL5pIT5bnLE+wR aAnlAWoF9t+2TE8Conbtl9hRcaDIKqs5rd8d1cV0W4vkrHJ7WOmRVP313wyxP+djXOiW ePbIgjgg2SgAjl5fRczy0pe82s5UK/PHyxMKEbjIF6XV+1po1HCihmmkpw8YJeCevz74 SQXQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=O65SFc+m; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 34si14613345plz.18.2019.08.12.15.58.31; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=O65SFc+m; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726851AbfHLWSe (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:18:34 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com ([209.85.167.67]:37086 "EHLO mail-lf1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726236AbfHLWSe (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:18:34 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id c9so75292953lfh.4 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:18:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bjZBUUnNFxwJGlVfiZU7+VhObtD1C6m0LDp2PvbJtzg=; b=O65SFc+mJYs+E9Cf4OIYCXxNY52bIE6S3QBlXC1V+l7rKq78RbsFJduqVoVuDazYiS 590oN0acJw181l6fgoQpGFSHJ0GJazZVZgwyImRJxxnzjT0pIcMvwK4uhOISUD9ZtIoa sAmR41hpmGyE0RNHnBjaxk65Ej0DyeOcqwOWDk8A2IszJzgSbLnxU6qjZlXAxAWYPPdz IxC899xsC5WnI9tmxX8Pj9HE87u+ukTAM4K8ptSNuUUNBwGS3WLv6vFMeoPmr8ZNP3Li vGkxlmBUdUnpOWS/INHeqsEPSgX4CQv28Znv1+osdKtQ+hf43HKWIpRl7SnI18oAjXPR rMww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bjZBUUnNFxwJGlVfiZU7+VhObtD1C6m0LDp2PvbJtzg=; b=mpRvaLvMNip3oOfUt3Va2PoFLeoyAP0K8pKlMyLZXJ2Z6qmtw0IVi7qtKKKjeFWbDp cAE5zcJeq6FJgfkaSSewG6WSOZ+NfQ7+bfmC1DxkwU3QCpBvXosk3UK9FfLaMklQYICO ab7fBCEecgwpJwGLy1TboVV+sBb7am1ysHv37YmCDuYYjbfnqvm1N6ufudftEoiait8V qaW48yfkx6KKWc9OLaogjOXA42+x3aZ0GrGBgjaxRGgQyTKSmxlvcE8i7IS+G3X9QsfS zdO3/5YruusxECinqRRQgdVuZmkXQn0aoRL9hhXcgDQrHihiw3sfcPIGBDKsLqAxfvOj 9jXA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVq2b/zXA/YmRejxoy5nuBVAg5Wn/wKWljXiPjfRuRpmGXsemI1 3xJuTRYipiUHK8bv369s9Y1nqOudQ0lQGT2U5B0= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46ea:: with SMTP id q10mr20552516lfo.118.1565648312549; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:18:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190812150348.GH26897@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20190812150348.GH26897@infradead.org> From: Charles Papon Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:18:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: kbuild: drop CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Bin Meng , Atish Patra , linux-riscv , linux-kernel , Paul Walmsley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Because it it the unix platform baseline as stated in the patch. I know that, but i'm looking for arguments why RVC could't be kept as an option, especialy it is only an optimisation option without behavioral/code changes. That baseline make sense for heavy linux distributions, where you expect everybody to compile with a baseline set of ISA extentions, to make binary exchanges easier. But for smaller systems, i do not see advantages having RVC forced. On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:03 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Charles Papon wrote: > > Please do not drop it. > > > > Compressed instruction extension has some specific overhead in small > > RISC-V FPGA softcore, especialy in the ones which can't implement the > > register file read in a asynchronous manner because of the FPGA > > technology. > > What are reasons to enforce RVC ? > > Because it it the unix platform baseline as stated in the patch.