Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1102214ybl; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:24:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyU9Wt5114Z5WNnGe43Sj9NzlR/tKF/dXRgS5rNT2ebDSi8Esqdg+QUFA5nbRAZZJoElS+ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9882:: with SMTP id r2mr9083894pfl.146.1565706288333; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:24:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565706288; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WCS/EM2RG3/sxlCepmrfcgPLxMoqtbLfXTO24V743vqqviztKoGT2ndJ8GSZcP5nqZ lUjQwx1B7tVAS3ZPDDN8OQd0R6ucBKwXE4jBexoLdenJ5pA75i3rZKH/Kb0g/cMr/+t3 ARkvmjSVgYxxAeX+0onk9deSpJN41gy8/5Dc8WyiH/lAmaB3uzyazDZ3t2GNvhE2+YBN +e0j+Z+GnWfDhUPskc9rkWNOiFLwYOoBxhwXCj73WFrxbzr9ZAwjrD6Ty/PqQ/007goW 2ztupIREWui9zyB34d4NJ9s9+szeXfXDMypWGPWd512jWDn78u+SOusF4/3barpk4bev uHjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=rZ7n8BeVM+7wfp+Vkw2/TamW1yCARqhUe9oSVTdmzas=; b=y86f6v0qfZAkhetCNSIaMSeCeMOMNxZRWODYz/lYavM+QYLPNWS5g+QKYj/1C3z2fP xvADN1lUsAKRiVlkajeAK7rbdqfJUJoPjnsuCFDyaewiXTmDvqVPzIMx/qstc+xA0GHq pWoyGcwZaSMoYvQTbvSwz69gM2o6WsxCfxUf/DHJ4zZHK7QruNUQifZiBDcuC2kxc8PD B/lnXB4rDsJXk3dOv//jSoiAH/FAQkyLJ7txHv+UhOLChV1Efm/kttw43xz5tqQ8aZQl kUYX44279nTkE6Fz0J0mrwF7SkLkzQeiY/pxSW0x2CQhGKKEV1dp5neH1A1h9b2yjzG6 yShw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 6si61981546pla.88.2019.08.13.07.24.31; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729587AbfHMOXM (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:23:12 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:25540 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729513AbfHMOXM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:23:12 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7DEJ7cq111818; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:23:00 -0400 Received: from ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (b.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.11]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ubxub09te-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:23:00 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7DEJjkL016478; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:22:59 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2u9nj6x95n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:22:59 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7DEMwoa46530858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:22:58 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1968B2065; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:22:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95178B205F; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:22:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.154]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:22:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6743E16C1293; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:22:59 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Greg KH , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Joel Fernandes (Google)" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the rcu tree Message-ID: <20190813142259.GZ28441@linux.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com References: <20190813155048.59dd9bdf@canb.auug.org.au> <0d7ff624-dce3-3961-b9a6-7de8eba2bdee@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0d7ff624-dce3-3961-b9a6-7de8eba2bdee@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-08-13_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908130152 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:50:05AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On 8/13/2019 7:50 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in: > > > > drivers/base/power/runtime.c > > > >between commit: > > > > 4a3a5474b4c1 ("driver/core: Convert to use built-in RCU list checking") > > > >from the rcu tree and commit: > > > > 515db266a9da ("driver core: Remove device link creation limitation") > > > >from the driver-core tree. > > > >I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > >is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > >conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > >is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > >with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > >complex conflicts. > > > The fix looks good to me, thanks! Same here, and thank you! Thanx, Paul