Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:32:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:32:08 -0500 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([207.109.151.240]:25870 "EHLO vger.timpanogas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:31:47 -0500 Message-ID: <3A0C5A41.16EEAE78@timpanogas.org> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:27:45 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" Organization: TRG, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Arcangeli CC: "Richard B. Johnson" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue] In-Reply-To: <20001110205129.A4344@inspiron.suse.de> <20001110212156.A4568@inspiron.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 03:07:46PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > It isn't a TCP/IP stack problem. It may be a memory problem. Every time > > sendmail spawns a child to send the file data, it crashes. That's > > why the file never gets sent! > > Sure that could be the case. You should be able to verify the kernel kills the > task with `dmesg`. > > However Jeff said the problem happens over 400K and a 500K attachment shouldn't > really run any machine out of memory, so maybe this wasn't his same problem? I think it is. So it looks like sendmail is bombing when it attempts to send large files. Jeff > > Andrea > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/