Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1408735ybl; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:05:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZ1BMwz7e4WL32TK0NWN37/oCrCJJsvIoyBfC06jMsW8FyWHMXh1uoPaLe8cXrfab4Jvld X-Received: by 2002:a63:5048:: with SMTP id q8mr35173756pgl.446.1565723109043; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:05:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565723109; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ok7mp6whgIuIYeLJD7LW6S2erE1I/v2T47Vr1CDYXsny5SERC4MQLb1Eaa3LGrt7LT 5B4Hu4iUdS0o+/07cZsKAY57AmD6yAJfgtBegtWRZ+AptBcCYTpIJ+qrrZUWX/GDSxtf IFfj0DO9X1J+SCj/XI16d8j9XWSY+jxyiyhWJQtoV6QBZ7hu0wRPyhTgnZsf47uneeAp qArlLMSOKGtoAo2STP6VaOijhW1wabQUkfkbRabBdgcmGz2bQfNr3XTes+8bYyOiTg28 PkOvQEQJBfDSeLNoHks8Yu48X/2K7ajt0kgRQ3lt7MelewtR4bV0OPDbd4PQatfZ+Csn oxNQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=CVOpJHPgn7fZLLPO6uI/O9bniRMMsZiS2eSUDvyGjF0=; b=dw2DPWgejFQl8uBmNg87I/DZKMGlE2x4mJbxzp5zpv7UBCFFuqMr+SBDZDKlYsEzlL djpq5g671F6Q0JhWqcEWZFu7zCCOswDNpz6SKz1nSVgRtXulAs3HgqX2pZ6wBehlV03q ifdzXqrYQULS55OIpBBkp7D6tJ6RkS23slA6XIQj0sseCnT+/MXcgo5IVxg3pgSJJLXR OWmgbUKurJ2ycfUBRl5KHdslTyM3vY7ElG7D+9TnGaJ713SptUkBlj9WRhkAQ2KE5ang nZJqGB/qqRVGsGAjJM+YPknIFlBSGlzj00slBQUigCacKyUnN4tqNa/5uO6IQt/Nr24y BLUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eibhSIM3; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w11si64052251pgr.321.2019.08.13.12.04.52; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eibhSIM3; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726594AbfHMTBO (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:01:14 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com ([209.85.167.65]:37868 "EHLO mail-lf1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726007AbfHMTBO (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:01:14 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id c9so77459142lfh.4; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:01:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CVOpJHPgn7fZLLPO6uI/O9bniRMMsZiS2eSUDvyGjF0=; b=eibhSIM31XxD1E5+yfK7lMRwVGPXGrHLnIavFPZIBjAEVsmaFTEkBTMADv4aVVBktD 3gcyndT2yyBm0sFkEGy5uA7fxGjzovlzC8FytdDQXGZpe3UpzL7JtWsRsWj+jjp+qfUG UIcP6A+++IdrjPKJNdl4oqF43jxS9cP02UuqssxWUCAjr49d3PBQb5jXaPhwUnr8xVAw cmnHU6Tg9jK3whmmj0CLfg5dDJ6j0ZuuI/DGDjyE9Ub3SWsd1vorDTR9/xbeoAD+uRLk PUhTky48a/YpBjrZapUFOLR0cFrOU8JRLByKfko3tQ7xMqtbZyRczv0i6NMuVkMRmuQl vVdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CVOpJHPgn7fZLLPO6uI/O9bniRMMsZiS2eSUDvyGjF0=; b=pUrldh05i4yKBjgU8AuLD6QUqrNyc7rIjEW5VilQhVEtiPFaRCnseHcqKBq4m7v9oG Zd+CikbthmQe1XcvRbBEKHRqssVHx+Stcx2G5L10UqpOpdMV5wKGLVXZWWryw2wc7/vc jc0a63Gy0v34hP0thHgPb2/fUSnWlJYthN/jeF3Izjq8qt622dejSRTZXQAeyW9joiwp 66rBFnPK/ZFP+e4DJQboEz+FNOdxJoIEcOZFicbCjkont66OEv13/ufnPsvBQrh3dekU x3hJqUX8SHIXIy8CTssAFP6JwQLt9pfy1H2i/PE4n2+9VNCWQDieGRGP6AN+KAZz1pe6 mYsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWskKRzpPaZocRtAwp5st1s70SDR7oDjev/l4kta7BpeOJ49wh9 twtF+MtzUYBTpe3KnnbYaU//SesPpSxx+q7AgTvxKfQEy+w= X-Received: by 2002:a19:7006:: with SMTP id h6mr23374733lfc.5.1565722872640; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:01:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190810010758.16407-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alistair Francis Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:57:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] syscalls: Update the syscall #defines to match uapi To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Alistair Francis , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , Deepa Dinamani Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:49 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 3:11 AM Alistair Francis > wrote: > > > > Update the #defines around sys_fstat64() and sys_fstatat64() to match > > the #defines around the __NR3264_fstatat and __NR3264_fstat definitions > > in include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h. This avoids compiler failures if > > one is defined. > > What is the compiler failure you get? I don't have it infornt of me but it was along the lines of sys_fstat64/sys_fstatat64 not being defined when __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT is defined but __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 isn't. > > > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis > > --- > > include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h > > index 2bcef4c70183..e4bf5e480d60 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/syscalls.h > > +++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h > > @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_readlinkat(int dfd, const char __user *path, char __user *bu > > asmlinkage long sys_newfstatat(int dfd, const char __user *filename, > > struct stat __user *statbuf, int flag); > > asmlinkage long sys_newfstat(unsigned int fd, struct stat __user *statbuf); > > -#if defined(__ARCH_WANT_STAT64) || defined(__ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_STAT64) > > +#if defined(__ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT) || defined(__ARCH_WANT_STAT64) > > asmlinkage long sys_fstat64(unsigned long fd, struct stat64 __user *statbuf); > > asmlinkage long sys_fstatat64(int dfd, const char __user *filename, > > struct stat64 __user *statbuf, int flag); > > I think this is wrong: when __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT is set, we are > on a 64-bit architecture and only want the sys_newfstat{,at} system > calls, not sys_fstat{,at}64 that gets used on 32-bit machines. Ah, that would make sense then. I don't think you will see the error then. Alistair > > The #if check in the syscalls.h file also matches the definition of > the function. > > Arnd