Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:57:03 +0800
From:   Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
        vbabka@suse.cz, osalvador@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mmap.c: extract __vma_unlink_list as counter part
 for __vma_link_list
Message-ID: <20190814065703.GA6433@richard>
Reply-To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
References: <20190814021755.1977-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
 <20190814021755.1977-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
 <20190814051611.GA1958@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190814051611.GA1958@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:16:11PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>Btw, is there any good reason we don't use a list_head for vma linkage?

Not sure, maybe there is some historical reason?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me