Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964850AbVLNQri (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:47:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964857AbVLNQri (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:47:38 -0500 Received: from MAIL.13thfloor.at ([212.16.62.50]:44252 "EHLO mail.13thfloor.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964850AbVLNQrh (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:47:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:47:36 +0100 From: Herbert Poetzl To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , LKML Subject: Re: [Vserver] Re: [ANNOUNCE] second stable release of Linux-VServer Message-ID: <20051214164736.GD6778@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mail-Followup-To: "Serge E. Hallyn" , vserver@list.linux-vserver.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , LKML References: <20051213185650.GA6466@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20051214143819.GB20138@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051214143819.GB20138@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2014 Lines: 46 On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:38:19AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Rik van Riel (riel@redhat.com): > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > > Well, as the OpenVZ folks announced their release on LKML > > > I just decided to do similar for the Linux-VServer release, > > > so please let me know if that is not considered appropriate. > > > > Since there is a legitimate (and very popular) use case for > > virtuozzo / vserver functionality, I think it is a good > > thing to get all the code out in the open. > > > > I really hope we will get something like BSD jail functionality > > in the Linux kernel. It makes perfect sense for hosting > > environments. > > Well a version for 2.6.15-rc2 is still at sf.net/projects/linuxjail. > I haven't resubmitted to lkml in a long time because I haven't found > or implemented a better solution for the network virtualization, which > Christoph wasn't happy with. The vserver ngnet or openvz networking > may be a good solution. Additionally, the pid virtualization we've > been discussing (and which should be submitted soon) would remove the > need for the tasklookup patch, so bsdjail would reduce even further, > to network and simple access controls. complete pid virtualization would be interesting for migration and checkpointing too (not just isolation and security), so I think that might be something of interest for a broader audience ... best, Herbert > Note that I would prefer to see the full vserver in the kernel... > > -serge > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/