Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp947913ybl; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:23:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwtq2BZLwxQblvH9XgXNIdZhEzyEgcqPbP1kM8U1w2PCylLnMDVhc6kIZJiU+jHMeS5off+ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9254:: with SMTP id 20mr496681pfp.212.1565796190105; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:23:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565796190; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=J/pIu1KGibvzmlE5PjONHNAVClH/C6l51m6v6rmmPvrhwYiciknYNyCYTvmf7Uh/pW oO7KonFbbNdEyxVg7XEs0TLXHCe0Y4N7+o0iLX1UbO8/2Xbee4P8nu9UusFgq1LY8iV4 Nmca0CPErdedypf7oBnW1CwMFEKHKPouo/NYTEg4IJhFv5lYYHGVyc96tF7JH/8UhKnw v8oQt2eQlUWrx9nyMPmTQGxWgh3pBKrWyCG+y6Nn66Nc8Fr5z/e1ZTEIMuHAYrKI8p0r LKYZH4X9s8WB/9B1zpfE+4/WcSU9ZZaqm/FRFXqHf3w34hNx4W41xq9Oe33n2N3i09CT trRA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:mail-followup-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dmarc-filter:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=K8BGYzO2dTUXJYuEK5K1PF5+7/NJXbtyyL+ogTVehtY=; b=aZBO7Iiio6+SubApIQ3MWg4/rnXurwyt8QpWE8bBDfcJnR9IfOWAXL/N6vYlBFyQpY iQ5SM5ESS/uyvcJXdpZLM3OuquqRHBXsTKKPMv/ijazSZqgBTgltlMiQQhk5iMjrPZV2 GFOgaOxlzjA6DFXeSQeMdlbIY/D91JBZ4J9sbqAhKoBMKCv1JygWmY4Xd4O+g9YEq3aH KLmaGjU/8TThciTL+HCm0l9Fxs+F2GAEYLWILW7qEBaMjRK3eWVCYTFFdDfo2RMvGaiL DvSTxBwHoO6zrkRAuEOQhgEEAWMwrwnKH/l0Z2aDYVuf2PjGgoSHSbQELFXssGOeZ5qY xWZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b="Tr/yF3Ve"; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=ETW9RdsU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t9si46050pjw.22.2019.08.14.08.22.53; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b="Tr/yF3Ve"; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=ETW9RdsU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728051AbfHNPVY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:21:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:43380 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725955AbfHNPVX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:21:23 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A99936083E; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:21:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1565796081; bh=VTckUJ4d43xDm2Es4eR+sUNKFhiK2msgTlmLL0cSNgU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Tr/yF3Ve+cpDGIGUTiLbDk+s3Nr8217yGVtqZwECUKAWYkdomu9S8T2CnRi5om+ZY taRlS5/z5nIPEzIQxYrDSPZiaL6eJp3qTNxy6nWuP4oljN+jvihW6+Vwk9Q5ozCh+G vXVRUha3xAve2rxg/XSV8pjl+intAsA4SRy6XSyk= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jcrouse@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3C3D60740; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:21:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1565796079; bh=VTckUJ4d43xDm2Es4eR+sUNKFhiK2msgTlmLL0cSNgU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ETW9RdsU/WKaelJg8mk5BMznq/fUxK0sQm6i7TydUK7lSVyyoH78vLyHBR3tRdv+k zR2pN3yN40hna+115p3QphfLwFg5m1QXwanz9peKI6wpqxpvt3gHRVNbClXhBEmNqN 3Kl5qEZa5x2BuZaVEVRcGE8K8YArbRGu1cJeM3w4= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org A3C3D60740 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jcrouse@codeaurora.org Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:21:16 -0600 From: Jordan Crouse To: Sibi Sankar Cc: Saravana Kannan , Rob Herring , Georgi Djakov , Bjorn Andersson , agross@kernel.org, LKML , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Evan Green , David Dai , linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] interconnect: qcom: Add OSM L3 interconnect provider support Message-ID: <20190814152116.GB28465@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com> Mail-Followup-To: Sibi Sankar , Saravana Kannan , Rob Herring , Georgi Djakov , Bjorn Andersson , agross@kernel.org, LKML , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Evan Green , David Dai , linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org References: <20190807112432.26521-1-sibis@codeaurora.org> <20190807112432.26521-3-sibis@codeaurora.org> <9ea6ab4c-6357-653b-f91c-9b649205f0ab@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 05:00:49PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: > On 2019-08-14 06:13, Saravana Kannan wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:37 AM Sibi Sankar wrote: > >> > >>Hey Saravana, > >> > >>Thanks for the review! > >> > >>On 8/8/19 2:51 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > >>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:24 AM Sibi Sankar wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On some Qualcomm SoCs, Operating State Manager (OSM) controls the > >>>> resources of scaling L3 caches. Add a driver to handle bandwidth > >>>> requests to OSM L3 from CPU/GPU. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig | 7 + > >>>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile | 2 + > >>>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c | 292 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>> 3 files changed, 301 insertions(+) > >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig > >>>> index d5e70ebc24108..f6c2a11a1a2c9 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig > >>>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Kconfig > >>>> @@ -5,6 +5,13 @@ config INTERCONNECT_QCOM > >>>> help > >>>> Support for Qualcomm's Network-on-Chip interconnect hardware. > >>>> > >>>> +config INTERCONNECT_QCOM_OSM_L3 > >>>> + tristate "Qualcomm OSM L3 interconnect driver" > >>>> + depends on INTERCONNECT_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST > >>>> + help > >>>> + Say y here to support the Operating State Manager (OSM) interconnect > >>>> + driver which controls the scaling of L3 caches on Qualcomm SoCs. > >>>> + > >>>> config INTERCONNECT_QCOM_SDM845 > >>>> tristate "Qualcomm SDM845 interconnect driver" > >>>> depends on INTERCONNECT_QCOM > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile > >>>> index 1c1cea690f922..9078af5fed109 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile > >>>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/Makefile > >>>> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ > >>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > >>>> > >>>> +icc-osm-l3-objs := osm-l3.o > >>>> qnoc-sdm845-objs := sdm845.o > >>>> > >>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_QCOM_OSM_L3) += icc-osm-l3.o > >>>> obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_QCOM_SDM845) += qnoc-sdm845.o > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 0000000000000..1e7dfce6f4f9b > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,292 @@ > >>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > >>>> +/* > >>>> + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > >>>> + * > >>>> + */ > >>>> + > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> +#include > >>>> + > >>>> +#define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES 40U > >>>> +#define LUT_SRC GENMASK(31, 30) > >>>> +#define LUT_L_VAL GENMASK(7, 0) > >>>> +#define LUT_ROW_SIZE 32 > >>>> +#define CLK_HW_DIV 2 > >>>> + > >>>> +/* Register offsets */ > >>>> +#define REG_ENABLE 0x0 > >>>> +#define REG_FREQ_LUT 0x110 > >>>> +#define REG_PERF_STATE 0x920 > >>>> + > >>>> +#define OSM_L3_MAX_LINKS 1 > >>>> + > >>>> +#define to_qcom_provider(_provider) \ > >>>> + container_of(_provider, struct qcom_icc_provider, provider) > >>>> + > >>>> +enum { > >>>> + SDM845_MASTER_OSM_L3_APPS = SLAVE_TCU + 1, > >>>> + SDM845_MASTER_OSM_L3_GPU, > >>>> + SDM845_SLAVE_OSM_L3, > >>>> +}; > >>>> + > >>>> +struct qcom_icc_provider { > >>>> + void __iomem *base; > >>>> + unsigned int max_state; > >>>> + unsigned long lut_tables[LUT_MAX_ENTRIES]; > >>>> + struct icc_provider provider; > >>>> +}; > >>>> + > >>>> +/** > >>>> + * struct qcom_icc_node - Qualcomm specific interconnect nodes > >>>> + * @name: the node name used in debugfs > >>>> + * @links: an array of nodes where we can go next while traversing > >>>> + * @id: a unique node identifier > >>>> + * @num_links: the total number of @links > >>>> + * @buswidth: width of the interconnect between a node and the bus > >>>> + */ > >>>> +struct qcom_icc_node { > >>>> + const char *name; > >>>> + u16 links[OSM_L3_MAX_LINKS]; > >>>> + u16 id; > >>>> + u16 num_links; > >>>> + u16 buswidth; > >>>> +}; > >>>> + > >>>> +struct qcom_icc_desc { > >>>> + struct qcom_icc_node **nodes; > >>>> + size_t num_nodes; > >>>> +}; > >>>> + > >>>> +#define DEFINE_QNODE(_name, _id, _buswidth, ...) \ > >>>> + static struct qcom_icc_node _name = { \ > >>>> + .name = #_name, \ > >>>> + .id = _id, \ > >>>> + .buswidth = _buswidth, \ > >>>> + .num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(((int[]){ __VA_ARGS__ })), \ > >>>> + .links = { __VA_ARGS__ }, \ > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> +DEFINE_QNODE(osm_apps_l3, SDM845_MASTER_OSM_L3_APPS, 16, SDM845_SLAVE_OSM_L3); > >>>> +DEFINE_QNODE(osm_gpu_l3, SDM845_MASTER_OSM_L3_GPU, 16, SDM845_SLAVE_OSM_L3); > >>>> +DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3, SDM845_SLAVE_OSM_L3, 16); > >>>> + > >>>> +static struct qcom_icc_node *sdm845_osm_l3_nodes[] = { > >>>> + [MASTER_OSM_L3_APPS] = &osm_apps_l3, > >>>> + [MASTER_OSM_L3_GPU] = &osm_gpu_l3, > >>>> + [SLAVE_OSM_L3] = &osm_l3, > >>>> +}; > >>>> + > >>>> +static struct qcom_icc_desc sdm845_osm_l3 = { > >>>> + .nodes = sdm845_osm_l3_nodes, > >>>> + .num_nodes = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_osm_l3_nodes), > >>>> +}; > >>>> + > >>>> +static int qcom_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 avg_bw, > >>>> + u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + *agg_avg += avg_bw; > >>>> + *agg_peak = max_t(u32, *agg_peak, peak_bw); > >>>> + > >>>> + return 0; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +static int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + struct icc_provider *provider; > >>>> + struct qcom_icc_provider *qp; > >>>> + struct qcom_icc_node *qn; > >>>> + struct icc_node *n; > >>>> + unsigned int index; > >>>> + u32 agg_peak = 0; > >>>> + u32 agg_avg = 0; > >>>> + u64 rate; > >>>> + > >>>> + qn = src->data; > >>>> + provider = src->provider; > >>>> + qp = to_qcom_provider(provider); > >>>> + > >>>> + list_for_each_entry(n, &provider->nodes, node_list) > >>>> + qcom_icc_aggregate(n, n->avg_bw, n->peak_bw, > >>>> + &agg_avg, &agg_peak); > >>>> + > >>>> + rate = max(agg_avg, agg_peak); > >>>> + rate = icc_units_to_bps(rate); > >>>> + do_div(rate, qn->buswidth); > >>>> + > >>>> + for (index = 0; index < qp->max_state; index++) { > >>>> + if (qp->lut_tables[index] >= rate) > >>>> + break; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + writel_relaxed(index, qp->base + REG_PERF_STATE); > >>>> + > >>>> + return 0; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +static int qcom_osm_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + u32 info, src, lval, i, prev_freq = 0, freq; > >>>> + static unsigned long hw_rate, xo_rate; > >>>> + const struct qcom_icc_desc *desc; > >>>> + struct icc_onecell_data *data; > >>>> + struct icc_provider *provider; > >>>> + struct qcom_icc_node **qnodes; > >>>> + struct qcom_icc_provider *qp; > >>>> + struct icc_node *node; > >>>> + size_t num_nodes; > >>>> + struct clk *clk; > >>>> + int ret; > >>>> + > >>>> + clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "xo"); > >>>> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) > >>>> + return PTR_ERR(clk); > >>>> + > >>>> + xo_rate = clk_get_rate(clk); > >>>> + clk_put(clk); > >>>> + > >>>> + clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "alternate"); > >>>> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) > >>>> + return PTR_ERR(clk); > >>>> + > >>>> + hw_rate = clk_get_rate(clk) / CLK_HW_DIV; > >>>> + clk_put(clk); > >>>> + > >>>> + qp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*qp), GFP_KERNEL); > >>>> + if (!qp) > >>>> + return -ENOMEM; > >>>> + > >>>> + qp->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); > >>>> + if (IS_ERR(qp->base)) > >>>> + return PTR_ERR(qp->base); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */ > >>>> + if (!(readl_relaxed(qp->base + REG_ENABLE) & 0x1)) { > >>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error hardware not enabled\n"); > >>>> + return -ENODEV; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) { > >>>> + info = readl_relaxed(qp->base + REG_FREQ_LUT + > >>>> + i * LUT_ROW_SIZE); > >>>> + src = FIELD_GET(LUT_SRC, info); > >>>> + lval = FIELD_GET(LUT_L_VAL, info); > >>>> + if (src) > >>>> + freq = xo_rate * lval; > >>>> + else > >>>> + freq = hw_rate; > >>>> + > >>>> + /* > >>>> + * Two of the same frequencies with the same core counts means > >>>> + * end of table > >>>> + */ > >>>> + if (i > 0 && prev_freq == freq) > >>>> + break; > >>>> + > >>>> + qp->lut_tables[i] = freq; > >>>> + prev_freq = freq; > >>>> + } > >>>> + qp->max_state = i; > >>>> + > >>>> + desc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > >>>> + if (!desc) > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> + > >>>> + qnodes = desc->nodes; > >>>> + num_nodes = desc->num_nodes; > >>>> + > >>>> + data = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, num_nodes, sizeof(*node), GFP_KERNEL); > >>>> + if (!data) > >>>> + return -ENOMEM; > >>>> + > >>>> + provider = &qp->provider; > >>>> + provider->dev = &pdev->dev; > >>>> + provider->set = qcom_icc_set; > >>>> + provider->aggregate = qcom_icc_aggregate; > >>>> + provider->xlate = of_icc_xlate_onecell; > >>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&provider->nodes); > >>>> + provider->data = data; > >>>> + > >>>> + ret = icc_provider_add(provider); > >>>> + if (ret) { > >>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error adding interconnect provider\n"); > >>>> + return ret; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++) { > >>>> + size_t j; > >>>> + > >>>> + node = icc_node_create(qnodes[i]->id); > >>>> + if (IS_ERR(node)) { > >>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(node); > >>>> + goto err; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + node->name = qnodes[i]->name; > >>>> + node->data = qnodes[i]; > >>>> + icc_node_add(node, provider); > >>>> + > >>>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "registered node %p %s %d\n", node, > >>>> + qnodes[i]->name, node->id); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* populate links */ > >>>> + for (j = 0; j < qnodes[i]->num_links; j++) > >>>> + icc_link_create(node, qnodes[i]->links[j]); > >>>> + > >>>> + data->nodes[i] = node; > >>>> + } > >>>> + data->num_nodes = num_nodes; > >>>> + > >>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, qp); > >>>> + > >>>> + return ret; > >>>> +err: > >>>> + list_for_each_entry(node, &provider->nodes, node_list) { > >>>> + icc_node_del(node); > >>>> + icc_node_destroy(node->id); > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + icc_provider_del(provider); > >>>> + return ret; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +static int qcom_osm_l3_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + struct qcom_icc_provider *qp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > >>>> + struct icc_provider *provider = &qp->provider; > >>>> + struct icc_node *n; > >>>> + > >>>> + list_for_each_entry(n, &provider->nodes, node_list) { > >>>> + icc_node_del(n); > >>>> + icc_node_destroy(n->id); > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + return icc_provider_del(provider); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +static const struct of_device_id osm_l3_of_match[] = { > >>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3", .data = &sdm845_osm_l3 }, > >>>> + { }, > >>>> +}; > >>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, osm_l3_of_match); > >>>> + > >>>> +static struct platform_driver osm_l3_driver = { > >>>> + .probe = qcom_osm_l3_probe, > >>>> + .remove = qcom_osm_l3_remove, > >>>> + .driver = { > >>>> + .name = "osm-l3", > >>>> + .of_match_table = osm_l3_of_match, > >>>> + }, > >>>> +}; > >>>> +module_platform_driver(osm_l3_driver); > >>>> + > >>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm OSM L3 interconnect driver"); > >>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > >>> > >>> Did a quick scan of the code and it's not clear how you connect the L3 > >>> interconnect provider to the rest of the interconnect. I don't see any > >>> DT or code references to the rest of the interconnects in the system. > >>> If GPU is making a bandwidth request all the way to L3, how do you > >>> make sure the interconnects between GPU and L3 also scale up properly. > >> > >>For SDM845 OSM L3 provider the icc nodes endpoints are isolated from > >>rsc icc node endpoints i.e GPU would need to vote on this path in > >>addition to voting for DDR. On future SoCs if the need to scale > >>interconnect between GPU rsc nodes along with the OSM l3 nodes arises, > >>it can be trivially extended by linking the osm icc nodes with global > >>icc node ids of the gpu rsc nodes. > > > >Sorry, I'm not sure we are talking about the same thing. To keep the > >discussion focused, let's completely ignore GPU's DDR needs for now. > > > >Talking about GPU <-> L3 traffic, unless the GPU is directly connected > >to the L3 with no additional interconnects in between (unlikely), this > >L3 provider need to connect the L3 icc node with the rest of the > >interconnect nodes. Otherwise, even if the L3 itself is provisioned to > >handle, say 10 GB/s, the interconnects connecting the GPU to L3 might > >be left at 1 GB/s. > > > >So, can we please connect this node to the rest of the interconnect > >nodes in SDM845? > > Sure I'll double check if GPU has a l3 > scaling requirement on SDM845 SoCs and > drop/link it to the rsc nodes appropriately. GPU doesn't use I/O coherency at the moment and I don't think we would need an independent connection if we did. Jordan > > > >Thanks, > >Saravana > > -- > -- Sibi Sankar -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project