Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 15:33:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 15:32:54 -0400 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:6272 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 15:32:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 15:30:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Richard B. Johnson" Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: Bill Davidsen cc: Chris Siebenmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Bill Davidsen wrote: > On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Chris Siebenmann wrote: > > > You write: > > | I've beaten this dead horse before, but Linux will not look to > > | management like a viable candidate for default o/s until whoever releases Then educate "management". Have them use another Operating System. Try Microsoft Windows-2000/Professional. I've got it on my lap-top. It has never crashed so it's pretty good by Microsoft standards. However, I just finished downloading the latest Linux-kernel by using FTP on that machine. I didn't want to tie up this machine. I started the download at about 11:00 this morning. It finished around 3:00 this afternoon. We have a 1.3 GHz fiber link and the LAN is 100 MB/s. Pretty good for something that usually takes 5 minutes on Linux. As I see it, you get the chance to complain about some poor performance because you don't have anything to compare present performance against. So, you upgrade to a minimally-tested kernel and complain that it's not a "viable candidate for default o/s..." -your words. Guess what, this complaint will always fall upon deaf ears. What will help get your bleeding-edge kernel stable, is a bug report, a performance report, and sometimes even a "Hey... This one works great!". Don't ever expect the kernel's internals to remain constant. This means that you will have to modify any of your custom modules for each and every kernel you download. You can expect the API to remain constant. If it doesn't you have a valid beef. Otherwise, you will be talking to the forest. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.1 on an i686 machine (799.53 BogoMips). I was going to compile a list of innovations that could be attributed to Microsoft. Once I realized that Ctrl-Alt-Del was handled in the BIOS, I found that there aren't any. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/