Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965119AbVLNXtE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:49:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965121AbVLNXtE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:49:04 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:31876 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965119AbVLNXtB (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:49:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:48:07 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20051214.154807.46858829.davem@davemloft.net> To: torvalds@osdl.org Cc: bunk@stusta.de, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <20051214140531.7614152d.akpm@osdl.org> <20051214221304.GE23349@stusta.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 627 Lines: 16 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:36:59 -0800 (PST) > It also refuses to turn on for SPARC64, since that seems to be known > broken. Or should it be just "SPARC"? Davem? Refuse it just for SPARC64. I intend to track down what the problem is eventually. But for now, allowing folks to enable it is only resulting in tons of duplicate bug reports. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/