Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1997277ybl; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:56:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJeQyfFD/I09F0BitbsDrbya3DdH8PEwOsFSaRFj9ki08JnnsjfUWaqmVqDkDi586iZJkE X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:14c:: with SMTP id em12mr1967662pjb.28.1565870176139; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:56:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565870176; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Nf3ZDivGaw5dcjxOKZrMwSz18weCWg8cv8r+zeyvaABU9RpNOO/PB4cHKGziiprLu4 /nr0QADBOoC+JsD/ZjsNn8IWI//uzqEeq8399T782w2Pizz/DwKYP+HzRVioswcFvmKZ fhD4mzm/xfIHAqIpU5vat13PXpZTB04M83j72rmeYmsORIpE5jW3Z10OJoTbraqOJBhY sQdVKNKprdRzGHp+i0rU1MjbXmIb7cA57o57LeliqE0GdLfGqWiXmqSAXBxg0aruUVFj TqPSEN8jBKIMlsJWKreqsugujpR8stgZU6dNB4m4o0THNALuRsrIU+4FkDsDCf2qxPZv +UgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=2QDaECxT2sB8N0Xhf0yvO4xLgKbME4TcG0vuyXrc/2A=; b=HFKFEzhZq3UafNQE8/U8JzPZPMzcGXq9oZnT65TxKHRUuH59eH+51+rXmMYEzgPwuu lZSEmM3ugSvEIKJLGVPomOFl/ad27pHpTbFYuscvwsfcXnoA/FL1AWEgGRVvbEuc3o1b IoD0RCereR1HRJPTpTIU1L06r4f+V++/jlr2OWh32e3HEetvRl6xzs6sSEM5iFNww3Oj oW+bKqiZpWMevgGEJ2mgTMSx7pdA8LhqWUt/9JMRAYxvhEeNNpn+79ZM8aQko14TMDD4 7jS372kiViJbZP0eKYQA9mSdoFC9tw+Nc+vEUyVNXhKyLvYvvhbAOxrEphmWfJ2joZWa E+TA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o8si1668940pgd.582.2019.08.15.04.55.59; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731052AbfHOLxo (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:53:44 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:43046 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728922AbfHOLxn (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:53:43 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E83528; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:53:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.20]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B0783F694; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:53:41 +0100 From: Andrew Murray To: Xiaowei Bao Cc: jingoohan1@gmail.com, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, bhelgaas@google.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, leoyang.li@nxp.com, kishon@ti.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, roy.zang@nxp.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] PCI: designware-ep: Add the doorbell mode of MSI-X in EP mode Message-ID: <20190815115340.GG43882@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190815083716.4715-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> <20190815083716.4715-2-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190815083716.4715-2-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1+81 (426a6c1) (2018-08-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:37:08PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > Add the doorbell mode of MSI-X in EP mode. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > index 75e2955..e3a7cdf 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > @@ -454,6 +454,20 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > return 0; > } > > +int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq_doorbell(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > + u16 interrupt_num) > +{ > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); > + u32 msg_data; > + > + msg_data = (func_no << PCIE_MSIX_DOORBELL_PF_SHIFT) | > + (interrupt_num - 1); > + > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_MSIX_DOORBELL, msg_data); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > u16 interrupt_num) Have I understood correctly that the hardware provides an alternative mechanism that allows for raising MSI-X interrupts without the bother of reading the capabilities registers? If so is there any good reason to keep dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq? (And thus use it in dw_plat_pcie_ep_raise_irq also)? > { > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > index 2b291e8..cd903e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > @@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ > #define PCIE_MISC_CONTROL_1_OFF 0x8BC > #define PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN BIT(0) > > +#define PCIE_MSIX_DOORBELL 0x948 > +#define PCIE_MSIX_DOORBELL_PF_SHIFT 24 > +#define PCIE_MSIX_DOORBELL_VF_SHIFT 16 > +#define PCIE_MSIX_DOORBELL_VF_ACTIVE BIT(15) The _VF defines are not used, I'd suggest removing them. Thanks, Andrew Murray > + > /* > * iATU Unroll-specific register definitions > * From 4.80 core version the address translation will be made by unroll > @@ -399,6 +404,8 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > u8 interrupt_num); > int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > u16 interrupt_num); > +int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq_doorbell(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > + u16 interrupt_num); > void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno bar); > #else > static inline void dw_pcie_ep_linkup(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) > @@ -431,6 +438,13 @@ static inline int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, > return 0; > } > > +static inline int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq_doorbell(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, > + u8 func_no, > + u16 interrupt_num) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > static inline void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno bar) > { > } > -- > 2.9.5 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel