Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp2090940ybl; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 06:26:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqycPZ+dNWNT1IFAbKkZwJdaByuBRmlXH941gQqFmw3nwj3bapc3voyBXi25eAiiQQNzkIVG X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:240e:: with SMTP id h14mr2338115pje.9.1565875599221; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 06:26:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565875599; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q7DhmtHQq+CDwiphhyFPou/dSxq72yfYt72pgpq5hyQN9V3jG7kXRlxKoFo1w2KEgI FLfetXXP9XhJ78Od3/UlqdGW117gvbdLrzTh8t35Kg1RxIzaW44zVb0k8c7BmLIzdnww 7eE8UDV2A9KwdHsNafF05eHJIN2xMFtPACDfA9PvPFgyfZCSfLCudXv7T8sKpJ8OZ+5B TSwcpWFEr5C7mtX/8yMzDi2/cKU0jKe/em87yMFPAWqN7T0/EkJicbUWpbajMU9GWMjy g3/r0+30+zXu+2EZCHZUajWKPuzAjM2sUAnPx07CllqLMCdiKi554UathmbOp7+xrJ+A Brsg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=bdIXzIVw3uAECmROr6D3IxxejIsflva2skCEc+SbvS0=; b=dbZsLNUci14NpUgOgbfQT7B/5poUOPSDE5VmXp5IpeSM5qurvdbLuFFsukzQGeB7b6 gQjfD35XLD4nQkVNkCiskPvR90bp9zilma1iwBh5T5peHUkOmIrW0wGsFo5TePigQtla laNzXeE9RhFucFV4T9ATBbBqSkoXo5nBFeoN50ahz5DeUM0LNyZrCDz9EkrMWwVH+jeG EvqhXTrbCuWEDMjCYm5ygbZyIJBQbwlykqcaU/Wu9Kinkv0Q6O9qaOQZn3oS/o0W61Dv mhTzE79CsmII5WX52KG7Y5zBvwA3c911uPfBcZj9SEuokBoom1zMlLWHyT2NdsTMfIdf nEng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=EHJND28g; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z124si2022144pfb.208.2019.08.15.06.26.23; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 06:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=EHJND28g; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732293AbfHONX7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:23:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56970 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730497AbfHONX6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:23:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3AAF2084D; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:23:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1565875438; bh=PfwTzVCSXr21dQ1ordez0gev34AC45wWlAybBgaGBsE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EHJND28g6rME3qs2Q21unyp3Xy6nkSOiAXJR4Iw2eTD+eAyW4Jv6/PJioVx7vE0zu q+0yVVe/4S1C59OV2tvND93whR91u8cK5Tc3/3B6JsokvofQ/6+bHBHALZscMLyUgi fxfi2hZngnAiEkhUDwn/UAeJ2jFcVicKbgGU+KQw= Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 15:23:56 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Suwan Kim , shuah@kernel.org, valentina.manea.m@gmail.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] usbip: Implement SG support Message-ID: <20190815132356.GB27208@kroah.com> References: <20190808155435.10050-1-suwan.kim027@gmail.com> <20190814131951.GA1437@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190814131951.GA1437@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 06:19:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > FYI, I think my > > "usb: add a HCD_DMA flag instead of guestimating DMA capabilities" > > is the proper core fix for what your patch 1 works around, as the USB > core should not assume DMA capabilities based on the presence of a DMA > mask. I agree. Let's wait for Christoph's series to be applied before taking this one. thanks, greg k-h