Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1022821ybl; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:44:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzX0TA3CKAxEOjv6vbBoaTqeJC6Gq9ga0ctrkmkDt2MVWWsuabU7joyYk99frOF1m5/GDKj X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:220a:: with SMTP id c10mr7687090pje.33.1565966691505; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:44:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565966691; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QQ86VOa7lWUj9sJCBCxzqNYwAKX6/JoXqZxqSBvMn6MrLPqD0AY3OwyU3E2Eam2vWX 8TskTMmPdwYkrg+DMNR2wXCksVXtbzCiClT7WKv/77uK7l/cxGDJxUrS44iUGHZitNFO bJxKq8lmuiIZ2dFlxPpo2jsmA0CZm0JeDrxlc4nhImnWrJkgkjjh5zA+I9gNESRO0sux qRqOVIZ17K/1GSqi5A/epDjoDa014wdpvpdwcd7NSA5cb05nOQkCN4++JntpzMiWGkso My/VnhCwCRd/GKMbtHMHpg6N9BuI5lkFzRB5tNEv+oRemF9vjPeUGg6rnFiV5TErcgtu Agrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:to :from:date; bh=gX29LPQK8pFW9YBYErxbpnr/wZtKf7E6tpOV60LD1e0=; b=o5uQZ1IfUjv172EcZQY6dyhVlQLfYxJdG/f5U4Ui5V+m+xS3zpIvuFkSCUf77nFoXI w72ubLFkRIgTJrjDvN/bvQ2kFCmwj4/yV+F/BfKrY2SPcCY8NUm1Zyho+bdtNy87Wk3c y5NxfRl49lF8bt+uKdsP9zUshkTwDQty98KTuTPa6d3AwtbvgFwLHpKyCT/Y0QneGmqA ly7w8/cND25ksQFH565MT/XMTlI16CT1hRR4FKKbqwzLBZYl2ZcFBQ9Vg0QONx9a6mrj WItvuVnXR7mlXPc4oAP0GUpdjX3quyVFrhziV8S3QR9eL1f3CERGA6a/xixAbH8/TdKX paFA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p33si3985765pgb.0.2019.08.16.07.44.35; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727436AbfHPOnf (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:43:35 -0400 Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:42833 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727245AbfHPOnf (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:43:35 -0400 Received: from cpe-2606-a000-1405-226e-0-0-0-cbf.dyn6.twc.com ([2606:a000:1405:226e::cbf] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1hydRo-0001vH-GH; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:43:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:42:45 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Pavel Machek , "Lendacky, Thomas" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Chen Yu , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: Non-random RDRAND Re: [PATCH] x86/CPU/AMD: Clear RDRAND CPUID bit on AMD family 15h/16h Message-ID: <20190816144245.GA25489@localhost.localdomain> References: <776cb5c2d33e7fd0d2893904724c0e52b394f24a.1565817448.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> <20190814232434.GA31769@amd> <20190815151224.GB18727@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190815151224.GB18727@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:12:24AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 01:24:35AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Burn it with fire! > > > > I mean... people were afraid RDRAND would be backdoored, and you now > > confirm ... it indeed _is_ backdoored? /., here's news for you! > > To be fair to AMD, I wouldn't call it a backdoor. Hanlon's razor is > applicable here: > > "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately > explained by neglect." > > (Sometimes other words are used instead of neglect, but i'm trying to > be nice.) > Is it worth setting up a quirk for the Excavator era cpus, that triggers a call to rdseed on resume? Working under the assumption that calling rdseed would kick the rdrand instruction back into gear. Neil > > - Ted > > P.S. Also applicable: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZxzJGgox_E >