Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1089850ybl; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:43:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxBvvl+lyPjIHvr8P15+vNC/Q2yO9ep6Z/+ojW/czP9cs/rdvAt6EHY1jPAziAq4frBI1hr X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2525:: with SMTP id j34mr8063662pje.11.1565970235913; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:43:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565970235; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=s9FjAJnvyiQd9QjwZ6ovrw2lvyaP7aupMUKptNDV4FN6Q/POAgS88BgO6tgW7wbUDN qEpb0EMhTo/QM2ng6Ojio56Fl4fVL8eD4gCweRAFJ9AyMRmaYuWA0DzVgSmWbPgEAWbm ZsPQF41j6LaZkFr55o2Sz36bHxo1Uqw5k5PFEOadHEroS84nsdnGP0wxpUA7EI4HCZmf kjiQB6Wulus4A7x3V3XoOQfe1j+1R+6g3lS/XbXE8emh3zh7STDWaE6qugWPpt0m6g2L Q+zjgrGHwQM0/ikplbs3WiRuK7xtpQsPDMtg1WibOlG8Viyrt0gmcolzj+Is2lnRTkNH VShA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=H9epFuDDC3baxjKYry6ijRBrRY2IrSR7ZzFw89ysTGs=; b=I2aGzurqqZB+LLQAeGiVhalyi7ShfVHxYM3vdmuC8wTz70FGY/LMe3ScsyKnT27nOn mHtns2WeLlLrHnJg9x2SEL4jMUkpgUXnBI8PP4G65WQkFHX+Vgtchx9JDVBuAEHZkD+x DgfkSnLQ34jl3nZeFdA3S4kcC+kAqj+IN5zFktTTdaJbdBQtYrvF5+Ww4oAQ232OF2xs IT4MLpk+bMV2nGWo3vItJc3kMrzmMKg70KvrFYCnQvq49kbB9wP28f7xKTKjSg1NtUCv JicNrvT+Z0nqXOYtx2VjvOZEPwaW2F2/PObejaKFDEpJCM47vlsbCBUH2ytlWipywBf7 97cg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iki.fi Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z2si3991532pgv.417.2019.08.16.08.43.40; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iki.fi Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727376AbfHPPmx (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:42:53 -0400 Received: from emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.107]:52456 "EHLO emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727311AbfHPPmx (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:42:53 -0400 Received: from darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi (85-76-65-201-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.65.201]) by emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F422002A; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:42:49 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:42:49 +0300 From: Aaro Koskinen To: Linus Walleij Cc: Martin Michlmayr , Peter Teichmann , Arnd Bergmann , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , soc@kernel.org, Russell King , Bartosz Golaszewski , Vinod Koul , linux-i2c , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support Message-ID: <20190816154249.GA30291@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> References: <20190809162956.488941-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190809163334.489360-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190812094456.GI10598@jirafa.cyrius.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:36:01AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > As Arnd points out, Debian used to have support for various iop32x > > devices. While Debian hasn't supported iop32x in a number of years, > > these devices are still usable and in use (RMK being a prime example). > > I suppose it could be a good idea to add support for iop32x to > OpenWrt and/or OpenEmbedded, both of which support some > pretty constrained systems. This platform is not really too constrained... E.g. on N2100 you have 512 MB RAM, SATA disks and gigabit ethernet. Not that different from mvebu that Debian currently (?) supports. Maybe with multiplatform they could support iop32x again. A.