Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1393720ybl; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:17:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw5+N3aSmOdUoipQ/0xF6k5re7YLCZgIdVn1FoWwfL36YLyNGDslRnMVH4zCD4wKNFR7hsc X-Received: by 2002:a62:8246:: with SMTP id w67mr13031126pfd.226.1565990261540; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:17:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565990261; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rLkCAnG4GifJxoqJU+lFBD2cg+rh0glh/SDEtu+6flfF4s5uANxX5Z4w9cZqriabYa rV098d9/zv1nzo9atYKuvflC0a1fss5P5PHmx363KKP1dgCko9LILjjeIVsR1q3lQ0SZ myhTgRdE/yZO0RILANIF+6XjIzxZkE3hOs5Dcdeaj0ymLxt7IbwoJMQGLcWFfDQRPq6e D9Gznnqrg7tLdwRV8jO3QaoB0FiyenPbCg4onLRIwfPmBBnR4k1VShd/xqam+bEJoaBF 9xK52z/U5YjLjFnp/WbZWaFEIbmh8jXvcYmlMvNLtfnYRDNvLmtcEwDTsOKPoa0KpZz+ Kk0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Int3qXRxTtMLZpwLZ2e6cbllifhw+j89MK6a4PSSxKs=; b=vYwjAxhJ+BZhc2YKJCnR+BUaoyFw0qH3N0fOUTIgR6CKitpslwC78XQyQlpBnOmfMo eXE9MV0Aec0LgHuOL3nl8+cNdKV481NregmOKLzTt3dsiouzMLGdX9FG5F6LL+WAcmqY +suRVjZQr/huMQjZ+jd6Ov+MOoNPOXEMcxEG59nXAa57bHnqWpr40sJ4ble7VMLEy6uy pwTDWYFTZazkHsGf+InrvIMo1ndC/B/1nYB4zCtvdnEBq/Lj/ThRRPmfwrv26JUdsdaT 5qF/7bXMjfOxarMAi+GXuIvexhFsEr+ver1eIRt7lRdRGvryCsnI9ECYsvxn+yRGcXgq YZdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=WMsue2VI; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o1si4893348pld.73.2019.08.16.14.17.26; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:17:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=WMsue2VI; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727868AbfHPVQm (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:16:42 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com ([209.85.166.66]:34083 "EHLO mail-io1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727848AbfHPVQj (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 17:16:39 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id s21so8994760ioa.1 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:16:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Int3qXRxTtMLZpwLZ2e6cbllifhw+j89MK6a4PSSxKs=; b=WMsue2VIg8HAKY+hUVTbQ3NledHMv2Vy3n21BHZtmEGvftmjPF9kPlF0azKgkb45rG 3eJb0K2ofV4rE5ojGEL84Bsuit8rGVd9s6Yk54sbK1lTSrJ6UJhDVGijSw6iFjtPQ9Ad aOCu/SA2uFJsSKD4bwejZP1+CAiv1ZZLfcGs6yG1SG1vDSqdntz4GuP1wQhO8nBHeOSI KA0PaBXa/qUFxQRwZ/EydvH9dxp0kzagGaBigUmp1kq0nT7lrgqJSOujPQL6mt4Hokxc PmNBeLE9XLvIrIxuc9NktzeND/yyTuLHL72DtYhmkGEKIDpjw/IKBfa8QTQllNN/xg+Y MUpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Int3qXRxTtMLZpwLZ2e6cbllifhw+j89MK6a4PSSxKs=; b=nQi+bkzQdOZ/Zpb4of6gV4rfl0ar7ucMdIeGtYIppiBuOaZbETnKnb0e3jk33OkGMd a57seYOxFGQBKyNnt+l8Mxkb4XrAD+KRevOHXsiOaYz/+tf5OSHkDU5dIT1k8NtZJGmg D7xMKO4M6wiWIEx9ELBjLnmjWVc7h/b982EfophHJf3TTXIJOfaJqvMwrQiNktyvlEZ6 2Po/5v807zxc8JOagAXCWPysIoSxVfOX65hHHPumKfHSgZ7g9pPhGHJuH7jdhYWBZMBI ywW9/NK+jACFqFBJYU0MTLAAMmoHiCK7fxhOv9gIC+ajlJLSE4pVEYMGJwKbQUuSmpOL HRew== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXa+occ3w7hjkyj7CWPVsaF1W6YqjomWg74Zo6bPLPDKLtUR0UI oV1hT4vvKF5N6+lFpg2wHw0qfRD7WZR5VRhaAY+fOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a02:c65a:: with SMTP id k26mr13146161jan.18.1565990197653; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:16:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190815162032.6679-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20190815162032.6679-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> From: Jim Mattson Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:16:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix x86_decode_insn() return when fetching insn bytes fails To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , kvm list , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:20 AM Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Jump to the common error handling in x86_decode_insn() if > __do_insn_fetch_bytes() fails so that its error code is converted to the > appropriate return type. Although the various helpers used by > x86_decode_insn() return X86EMUL_* values, x86_decode_insn() itself > returns EMULATION_FAILED or EMULATION_OK. > > This doesn't cause a functional issue as the sole caller, > x86_emulate_instruction(), currently only cares about success vs. > failure, and success is indicated by '0' for both types > (X86EMUL_CONTINUE and EMULATION_OK). > > Fixes: 285ca9e948fa ("KVM: emulate: speed up do_insn_fetch") > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson