Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 18 Aug 2019 11:15:51 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch : arm : add a criteria for pfn_valid
Message-ID: <20190818101551.GN13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <1566010813-27219-1-git-send-email-huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
 <20190817183240.GM13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <CAGWkznEvHE6B+eLnCn=s8Hgm3FFbbXcEdj_OxCM4NOj0u61FGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190818082035.GD10627@rapoport-lnx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190818082035.GD10627@rapoport-lnx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:20:35AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 03:46:51PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:32 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 11:00:13AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > > > From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
> > > >
> > > > pfn_valid can be wrong while the MSB of physical address be trimed as pfn
> > > > larger than the max_pfn.
> > >
> > > What scenario are you addressing here?  At a guess, you're addressing
> > > the non-LPAE case with PFNs that correspond with >= 4GiB of memory?
> > Please find bellowing for the callstack caused by this defect. The
> > original reason is a invalid PFN passed from userspace which will
> > introduce a invalid page within stable_page_flags and then kernel
> > panic.

Thanks.

> Yeah, arm64 hit this issue a while ago and it was fixed with commit
> 5ad356eabc47 ("arm64: mm: check for upper PAGE_SHIFT bits in pfn_valid()").
> 
> IMHO, the check 
> 
> 	if ((addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) != pfn)
> 
> is more robust than comparing pfn to max_pfn.

Yep, I'd prefer to see:

	phys_addr_t addr = __pfn_to_phys(pfn);

	if (__pfn_to_phys(addr) != pfn)
		return 0;

	return memblock_is_map_memory(addr);

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up