Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:08:53 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Mike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk>
cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, bhe@redhat.com,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, lijiang@redhat.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: Identify the end of the kernel area to
 be reserved
In-Reply-To: <CAHbf0-GpJY6SGz=9yXEh28vvBuHP-c_fKqP6u60Ag3et6FCPrg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908191504570.2147@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20190723130513.GA25290@kroah.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907231519430.1659@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20190723134454.GA7260@kroah.com> <20190724153416.GA27117@kroah.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907241746010.1791@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20190724155735.GC5571@kroah.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907241801320.1791@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20190724161634.GB10454@kroah.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907242153320.1791@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907242208590.1791@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20190725062447.GB5647@kroah.com>
 <CAHbf0-FenMwa6uMqpD_fJZLU3YKviOcMe_pBh8oWmUPoUYk_LA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbf0-GpJY6SGz=9yXEh28vvBuHP-c_fKqP6u60Ag3et6FCPrg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 12:09, Mike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > As it's related. I've raised
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 about the
> > relocatition I'm seeing since switching back to ld.bfd - is this safe
> > to ignore? I'm guessing this is why gold isn't working as it can't do
> > them
> 
> Sorry am I asking in the wrong place about this?

No, but I haven't come around to look at it. As your mail above is not
giving any useful information and requires to fire up a browser it got on
the back burner.

That bugzilla entry does not tell anything about the compiler involved, the
binutils version and the .config file. I'm really bad at guesswork and my
crystal ball got lost years ago :)

Care to give that information here by mail?

Thanks,

	tglx