Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750818AbVLORQr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:16:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750817AbVLORQr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:16:47 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:15276 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750789AbVLORQq (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:16:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:16:45 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Roman Zippel Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration Message-ID: <20051215171645.GY27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20051215085516.GU27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1429 Lines: 37 On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:00:05PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Al Viro wrote: > > > another compile fix, pulled straight from m68k CVS > > Thanks, but if you pull changes out of CVS could you please keep the > author intact? CVS may be bad, but it's not that bad. CVS users, OTOH... Mon Oct 22 09:34:34 2001 UTC (4 years, 1 month ago) by zippel Branches: MAIN CVS tags: m68k-2_5_9, m68k-2_5_8, m68k-2_5_7, m68k-2_5_65, [snip] m68k-2_4_13, m68k-2_4_12 Branch point for: m68k-2_4 Diff to previous 1.1: preferred, colored Changes since revision 1.1: +1 -0 lines import Geert's 2.4.12 m68k patch and the same for drivers/macintosh part. So who should I put as the author? You or Geert (or whatever attributions might have been in said big patch)? Incidentally, ADBREQ_RAW had leaked into mainline (sans definition) in 2.3.45-pre2, which was Feb 13 2000, i.e. more than 1.5 year before your commit, so there's quite a chunk of history missing... I'm serious, BTW - I certainly would have no problem preserving attribution, but it simply hadn't been there. CVS logs are only as good as the data being put there by committers... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/