Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:10:33 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To:     linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc:     gaoxiang25@huawei.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        yuchao0@huawei.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Message-ID: <1323459733.69859.1566234633793.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Subject: erofs: Question on unused fields in on-disk structs
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: bPOHXV7QxwRTyFuSImcS2EHKU0x0Yw==
Thread-Topic: erofs: Question on unused fields in on-disk structs
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi!

struct erofs_super_block has "checksum" and "features" fields,
but they are not used in the source.
What is the plan for these?

Same for i_checksum in erofs_inode_v1 and erofs_inode_v2.

At least the "features" field in the super block is something I'd
expect to be used.
...such that you can have new filesystem features in future.

Thanks,
//richard