Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp3354217ybl; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:20:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywpXVIAOpflQXeXYI6LDs5x4eAdpCd5eAr277fymwYP8vjufzGqttFCZPm5IY7v9cN/BZ7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d793:: with SMTP id z19mr23023592pju.36.1566260449874; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:20:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566260449; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zch58MajGYober/+n2KWYQQCAmJeTN4xb0MvtuFIinc29xj3b8GWFqvpFtAVQVrAFl HwDnLRjrQcNv6UaPygJItohNBGPjrc6RBaVgo0QSlqP2ATpacCR0R4DjFFrr8KIu2L9C sXkhZttQuKrCM5SC/0P1slpiWoYgXyP88DPtOUAo1jIvOVp2MeEnMoiiRJ9XJ9LGZGJO O0x7fliXBOX4v8d6xhWvFsnQfKTvdp+DH5o1CUp8gY2X2rB2ad3ribzD56Ck5k7QO1jM qMLStn1k85QfU4zL0xfcqfOr+61JdbYbm/IGdIm3TLmT4qIn9Z6RPchAVQgckkj2+7qR 6DCg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:from:subject:references :mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=l0D0FijjHNavvE4x6KoSMcY6aVnPYpY2dpif/cNLitk=; b=pcVNxduvY8qWdvGh1+jFS55TUoRlRBX30LZvv7qAo0jno2w1hfff9Xet3lOWzvf+7H fU1VNNjCB+zb0o5PxdE/JRDq0bW/O/agfqeNx4F9kVeTkbajVHd1AHvvxskUMxmBoYLu 9OflkfjvSMF2w+75Kq+5wCnZLA5N+E3dzZErvupr3mVGsX3VWcTsB1J1rGBekr6zvvbp qVYa5f4T2lAOPpQ6E26XKBmqtgoF/NTs0sOwnSbs/HmYZ+jEMbVBca3igLi9DcIN52H1 X8yom4XB0rj4AEtm5F6WZ5B0ldcflWhQ6UhKHhMy6q7arLwqiPG2pOyrdF5Rur2oEyMf n9jA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Pbcszmfo; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h189si10931979pgc.236.2019.08.19.17.20.34; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Pbcszmfo; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729194AbfHTATU (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:19:20 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-f202.google.com ([209.85.221.202]:33815 "EHLO mail-vk1-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729178AbfHTATQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:19:16 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f202.google.com with SMTP id l25so939969vkn.1 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=l0D0FijjHNavvE4x6KoSMcY6aVnPYpY2dpif/cNLitk=; b=Pbcszmfo0nBO9MridqaWaCmAvMTSKzWZF5bf08oJsft5Gw9UdsClZ/3l8pVt1WW3Om TeGXyUuWLHjajfOp9UAv1xzvhVCFEKDt2R6Hf7PPozGHpMUpP//3XuQkUqhZQu6yWFoc SD3i9b1jcaZZckls08n4PzLiiUYetxGJ9giY/QjFgDTVYN+AYAI5z4FRN0xNphj1z5BS 8Y4fM5nAzyU3sAOr9QG9Z0qxuksHBXeIpeg2XkOp2JBO/xlZMbp1xjBpaBVrTrm1BbW3 NincUSfhrlYLkkDB2M9Olx0VH03LJD82RbEe014R/lSjMxZcJylmUsPtdpN3ZNOHNslE wrVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=l0D0FijjHNavvE4x6KoSMcY6aVnPYpY2dpif/cNLitk=; b=LV91g2d8ucA3wViDxF67CAINtDBazTylbawjkLQI3X4TWiv6GddeSVBGlaYgWMAHmH MZbNYdYaOQx9yWT45ErwTJ6K4CHACvmJnF924UXRSQUFyfIfivkcF+c52SF82D2Cvgtm w62s2Yd7eCX8BXPWVVaK5VMAdcwdNwYEpDhDTU8GciikfNCgL4dQvlq6k4m+mQ7vhxGc 48P9armgTPZ3ZSPGnf/tDaCkYtxeEd/F7WCbvgxf9gI328dRBhmhBJdJSvnkpnvLGuSM XmOi3cVBnavIrdy5Dn/s6K+c9uwvxZYW9Lxzym4LZGz5jGlBwuROtjdi11jxhFcpfRxX eSrA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVfi09tn33pS6EVrzYECP6Bd5EeWhalhhYcxpV7DeBLAZ59SGYH j+tBWXQ5bTBcr+oRi9b3TVm7uRmBVbKCv3AD/6UAAw== X-Received: by 2002:a1f:7c0e:: with SMTP id x14mr9606134vkc.0.1566260355122; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:18:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20190820001805.241928-1-matthewgarrett@google.com> Message-Id: <20190820001805.241928-26-matthewgarrett@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20190820001805.241928-1-matthewgarrett@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog Subject: [PATCH V40 25/29] kexec: Allow kexec_file() with appropriate IMA policy when locked down From: Matthew Garrett To: jmorris@namei.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Matthew Garrett , Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Systems in lockdown mode should block the kexec of untrusted kernels. For x86 and ARM we can ensure that a kernel is trustworthy by validating a PE signature, but this isn't possible on other architectures. On those platforms we can use IMA digital signatures instead. Add a function to determine whether IMA has or will verify signatures for a given event type, and if so permit kexec_file() even if the kernel is otherwise locked down. This is restricted to cases where CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING is set in order to prevent an attacker from loading additional keys at runtime. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett Acked-by: Mimi Zohar Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: James Morris --- include/linux/ima.h | 9 ++++++ kernel/kexec_file.c | 10 +++++- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 2 ++ security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h index 00036d2f57c3..8e2f324fb901 100644 --- a/include/linux/ima.h +++ b/include/linux/ima.h @@ -129,4 +129,13 @@ static inline int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, return 0; } #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE */ + +#if defined(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE) && defined(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING) +extern bool ima_appraise_signature(enum kernel_read_file_id func); +#else +static inline bool ima_appraise_signature(enum kernel_read_file_id func) +{ + return false; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE && CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING */ #endif /* _LINUX_IMA_H */ diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c index 43109ef4d6bf..7f4a618fc8c1 100644 --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c @@ -208,7 +208,15 @@ kimage_validate_signature(struct kimage *image) return ret; } - return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_KEXEC); + /* If IMA is guaranteed to appraise a signature on the kexec + * image, permit it even if the kernel is otherwise locked + * down. + */ + if (!ima_appraise_signature(READING_KEXEC_IMAGE) && + security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_KEXEC)) + return -EPERM; + + return 0; /* All other errors are fatal, including nomem, unparseable * signatures and signature check failures - even if signatures diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index ca10917b5f89..874bd77d3b91 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ struct ima_kexec_hdr { u64 count; }; +extern const int read_idmap[]; + #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC void ima_load_kexec_buffer(void); #else diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 1cffda4412b7..1747bc7bcb60 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id read_id) return 0; } -static const int read_idmap[READING_MAX_ID] = { +const int read_idmap[READING_MAX_ID] = { [READING_FIRMWARE] = FIRMWARE_CHECK, [READING_FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER] = FIRMWARE_CHECK, [READING_MODULE] = MODULE_CHECK, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 7b53f2ca58e2..b8773f05f9da 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -1339,3 +1339,53 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) return 0; } #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY */ + +#if defined(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE) && defined(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING) +/* + * ima_appraise_signature: whether IMA will appraise a given function using + * an IMA digital signature. This is restricted to cases where the kernel + * has a set of built-in trusted keys in order to avoid an attacker simply + * loading additional keys. + */ +bool ima_appraise_signature(enum kernel_read_file_id id) +{ + struct ima_rule_entry *entry; + bool found = false; + enum ima_hooks func; + + if (id >= READING_MAX_ID) + return false; + + func = read_idmap[id] ?: FILE_CHECK; + + rcu_read_lock(); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules, list) { + if (entry->action != APPRAISE) + continue; + + /* + * A generic entry will match, but otherwise require that it + * match the func we're looking for + */ + if (entry->func && entry->func != func) + continue; + + /* + * We require this to be a digital signature, not a raw IMA + * hash. + */ + if (entry->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) + found = true; + + /* + * We've found a rule that matches, so break now even if it + * didn't require a digital signature - a later rule that does + * won't override it, so would be a false positive. + */ + break; + } + + rcu_read_unlock(); + return found; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE && CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING */ -- 2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog