Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751045AbVLOVcp (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:32:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751124AbVLOVcp (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:32:45 -0500 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]:48614 "EHLO mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751045AbVLOVco (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:32:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:32:34 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: JANAK DESAI , viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, chrisw@osdl.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, serue@us.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, linuxram@us.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/9] unshare system call: system call handler function Message-ID: <20051215213234.GB6990@mail.shareable.org> References: <1134513959.11972.167.camel@hobbs.atlanta.ibm.com> <43A1D435.5060602@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1429 Lines: 38 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I follow but I am very disturbed. > > You are leaving CLONE_NEWNS to mean you want a new namespace. > > For clone CLONE_FS unset means generate an unshared fs_struct > CLONE_FS set means share the fs_struct with the parent > > But for unshare CLONE_FS unset means share the fs_struct with others > and CLONE_FS set means generate an unshared fs_struct > > The meaning of CLONE_FS between the two calls in now flipped, > but CLONE_NEWNS is not. Please let's not implement it this way. I agree. > Part of the problem is the double negative in the name, leading > me to suggest that sys_share might almost be a better name. I agree with that suggestion, too. Alternatively, we could just add a flag to clone(): CLONE_SELF, meaning don't create a new task, just modify the properties of the current task. > So please code don't invert the meaning of the bits. This will > allow sharing of the sanity checks with clone. > In addition this leaves open the possibility that routines like > copy_fs properly refactored can be shared between clone and unshare. And also make the API less confusing to document and use. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/