Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751165AbVLOWrU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:47:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751172AbVLOWrU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:47:20 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:20660 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751165AbVLOWrU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:47:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:47:42 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jeff Garzik , Deepak Saxena Cc: jordan.crouse@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, info-linux@ldcmail.amd.com Subject: Re: Geode LX HW RNG Support Message-Id: <20051215144742.3463430a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <43A1E91A.4060400@pobox.com> References: <20051215211248.GE11054@cosmic.amd.com> <20051215211423.GF11054@cosmic.amd.com> <20051215133917.3f0a5171.akpm@osdl.org> <20051215214432.GB14013@cosmic.amd.com> <20051215140622.53c37335.akpm@osdl.org> <43A1E91A.4060400@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1401 Lines: 36 Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > "Jordan Crouse" wrote: > > > >>>Should all the Geode additions to hw_random.c be inside __i386__, like VIA? > >> > >>I thought that a early version did that and somebody took exception to > >>it, but I can't find any e-mails to that effect right now. Obviously, > >>the defines are only useful when you have a Geode CPU (and thus a x86_32), > >>so if nobody complains, I think that would be fine. > > > > > > Fair enough. Please send an update sometime. > > > > We might as well do s/__i386__/X86_32/ throughout that file - bit pointless > > but it's a little bit more idiomatic. > > What about the rng rewrite recently posted? Any opinions on that? (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/10/29/145) Looks sane. It ended up with Deepak deciding to split the various manufacturer bits apart and then send the patches in my direction. I don't think that happened? > I lean towards applying it, long term, but IIRC there were problems that > prevented immediate merge. There was some talk about moving functionality to userspace, but it seems a bit speculative. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/