Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp247989ybl; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:18:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHFHUmJ00q17KB5qmV7N53YDH7QRvCVThKrPy9e/tNEeWM+fZSin7BFqNbQRZRaqSrPmd2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f0c7:: with SMTP id fa7mr3044019pjb.115.1566353909647; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:18:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566353909; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qYrrn70+aNHvd1XJVr7/+Dv1sIjLDxN9qA5Dbs4S7T2OJY2uyzd2IMFLtL5nUagbq+ 6Rr/4crTuUnnTPkyU3EL6tIz0afJNyhivDicqUad2kA7r1YCtyDJg9lSa076AC2pqY8M jx/w2ciNBzWeD2Z53xUVq6P6YaQqm2Bc9HYEotOpiNjE/dgju1PaWjkutEahok7w5IhY 0sLheX6eORPopuPF18wBa/0wexArXzbnD6T4ebYG3Yo0WE+PwMBR10KPPS4bLlQOKMyl ibYXbkgBg+EyEaF97ntrby+1sywabk+YpjNKccwmJjcbk1qiX9FiYCbV4LhdAaPZNiAE 6dHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :dlp-reaction:dlp-version:dlp-product:content-language :accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:thread-index :thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=nuC50f7tc1Fgp5VP4YE/vUQmNEoRjFHhNqWg+sXepwE=; b=wtqQQnqpQ0EYHGsdhQZ2X8Jc19Im7yfppsWczTCA7ICZzl6bNA7munW0r9rgEDheQP 3/LdeIC47fcmJxuczGbP0iiEqqCoJI6MnC14aeEpeX5EkFDAUafVUZyxV+kF/+Wd2mwd BFok6VzihSoTZD6xaxIzeIuYJafBHX8MPxX/kxIOcXzCZqNjMNidwCy03JSQ9X3kcaDe A+SkY/nx0iKFDP/VlAFayOcwYh8k2WIQ6pWYZrpuzTqUtlSL2qdRY5xWEh7wKMc74EsQ IEZ5dawrA1c2uMlQR0K+EQu0VA5HZtRLfPmNPmB6ZEJ/WKEmJWvLFVM5EjqvR1jM1BAs XpNQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z9si13419621pgk.46.2019.08.20.19.18.14; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726947AbfHUBoA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:44:00 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:61730 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726193AbfHUBn7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:43:59 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2019 18:43:58 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,410,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="186092273" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2019 18:43:58 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx151.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.4) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:43:58 -0700 Received: from shsmsx106.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.159) by FMSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:43:57 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.19]) by SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.204]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:43:55 +0800 From: "Li, Philip" To: Juri Lelli , lkp CC: Juri Lelli , "kbuild-all@01.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "bigeasy@linutronix.de" , "rostedt@goodmis.org" , "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "williams@redhat.com" Subject: RE: [RT PATCH v2] net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp: Protect scratch buffer with local_lock Thread-Topic: [RT PATCH v2] net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp: Protect scratch buffer with local_lock Thread-Index: AQHVVyKEhEVKzLBRwE2fFpo1nIcR/qcE1Rpw Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 01:43:55 +0000 Message-ID: <831EE4E5E37DCC428EB295A351E66249520CA35E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20190819122731.6600-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <201908201356.Pffozrxv%lkp@intel.com> <20190820064203.GB6860@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20190820064203.GB6860@localhost.localdomain> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMjA3Yjg0YWQtYjE2ZS00ZTk5LWE2ODUtNWQxYzJmYmM1NTRiIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiM1FcL3U0YVh4cjdlTk5DelFcL1pZNzgrSEd3c0hheUR1TVZOS05RbWNUdWpIV3p5YXA4QXNhNXM4Zk1sazJXM3FqIn0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [RT PATCH v2] net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp: Protect scratch buffer with > local_lock > > Hi, > > On 20/08/19 13:35, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Juri, > > > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > > > [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] > > [cannot apply to v5.3-rc5 next-20190819] > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help > improve the system] > > This seems to be indeed the case, as this patch is for RT v4.19-rt > stable tree: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git v4.19-rt > > I was under the impression that putting "RT" on the subject line (before > PATCH) would prevent build bot to pick this up, but maybe something > else/different is needed? Hi Juri, currently if the mail subject has RFC, we will test it but send report privately to author only. > > Thanks, > > Juri