Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp470136ybl; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:05:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwdEeetWtDQJnlC+MnLAgWFiOahqwaYQbP0z+CxAT0w+4QqfVKiudrB4FUii6PJsFGvNQDg X-Received: by 2002:a63:f857:: with SMTP id v23mr27828126pgj.228.1566371156304; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:05:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566371156; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UO7uXG2Ej8owaBTaEip12b3ta2VRQW6+jdSovwfm3jZ281a08bFKxSW46metGjj4rm JJwXKAkI+JEBM/UihtXXBhWILactLCjvQgAtz4N+nUkc19ic6hG9mOuBR3S1lryufKrl 2ioeSJ0gtWSsnsllXDNduPL3shq4PLzkJkVLlGeAKHCU2OEv/xWH7hRAj++o8hZ5HySA YDs6hYil9Jn72Z8odlfG+ItRxie2/WdH309ynYcY/EXu/Tu+fp17Jt8QITzCpVVvIX68 GdcvuM194vDrXPsqgmlR9cjdT+7RyHL0bEOcA2BIjgPh2K2E5O7MMnGXPKYLZfplqisE 00KQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=kcyoz2nAajcOxJc2KJIL+mxw9s3xkwgEVk4d14NJVAY=; b=mzVSn4+hzbhB1TBgrQDOwqRwuxN4x8jLiYtBK/2Lx6+DSn0ArdaX7GOUmfFTPtYKz2 T5auDmoqujYBIrA6P2JXtHdLYgoNByMG7ACduOfZzN/vJ8CW27e3+MpcHOrmOdMbc/F0 yAoDjpzOeGXCDfGX8FqL79YLAFD7bRs/cNsuRgGRhzcszBcN/TUcWeKhAr2LGEIz9ZRk 19RxtlxQm9PR/Iw861W9YLRFLweRHdTwUVUjEEtZO1YCXiUZX2i5TFNsCz2In+wn3zGv D1RgK5Ejt4l4t3Zq/UZ9ikFpiZ2oBAgOgjeRa4gJyPyBKXx3jrAKjsyOrNn2ickgKa++ pdvQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si14988838pfe.271.2019.08.21.00.05.40; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727455AbfHUGre (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 02:47:34 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50746 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726372AbfHUGre (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 02:47:34 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59E2ABE3; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 06:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:47:32 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: David Rientjes Cc: Edward Chron , Andrew Morton , Roman Gushchin , Johannes Weiner , Tetsuo Handa , Shakeel Butt , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, colona@arista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/oom: Add oom_score_adj value to oom Killed process message Message-ID: <20190821064732.GW3111@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20190821001445.32114-1-echron@arista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 20-08-19 20:25:32, David Rientjes wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, Edward Chron wrote: > > > For an OOM event: print oom_score_adj value for the OOM Killed process to > > document what the oom score adjust value was at the time the process was > > OOM Killed. The adjustment value can be set by user code and it affects > > the resulting oom_score so it is used to influence kill process selection. > > > > When eligible tasks are not printed (sysctl oom_dump_tasks = 0) printing > > this value is the only documentation of the value for the process being > > killed. Having this value on the Killed process message documents if a > > miscconfiguration occurred or it can confirm that the oom_score_adj > > value applies as expected. > > > > An example which illustates both misconfiguration and validation that > > the oom_score_adj was applied as expected is: > > > > Aug 14 23:00:02 testserver kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 2692 > > (systemd-udevd) total-vm:1056800kB, anon-rss:1052760kB, file-rss:4kB, > > shmem-rss:0kB oom_score_adj:1000 > > > > The systemd-udevd is a critical system application that should have an > > oom_score_adj of -1000. Here it was misconfigured to have a adjustment > > of 1000 making it a highly favored OOM kill target process. The output > > documents both the misconfiguration and the fact that the process > > was correctly targeted by OOM due to the miconfiguration. Having > > the oom_score_adj on the Killed message ensures that it is documented. > > > > Signed-off-by: Edward Chron > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko > > Acked-by: David Rientjes > > vm.oom_dump_tasks is pretty useful, however, so it's curious why you > haven't left it enabled :/ Because it generates a lot of output potentially. Think of a workload with too many tasks which is not uncommon. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs